ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2008
Challenges in multidisciplinary cancer care among general surgeons in Canada.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Describing knowledge encounters in healthcare: a mixed studies systematic review and development of a classification.Implementation science : IS · 2017Pooled it
- 10 years of mindlines: a systematic review and commentary.Implementation science : IS · 2015Pooled it
- The Approach to Multidisciplinary Oncologic Breast Care.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2025Review
- Modelling of physicians' clinical information-seeking behaviour in Iran: a grounded theory study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- How do the characteristics of breast cancer diagnostic assessment programmes influence service delivery: A mixed methods study.European journal of cancer care · 2018Article
- Cost analysis of breast cancer diagnostic assessment programs.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2017Article
- Article
- "We talk it over"--mixed-method study of interdisciplinary collaborations in private practice among urologists and oncologists in Germany.BMC cancer · 2014Article
- Implementation of a regional virtual tumor board: a prospective study evaluating feasibility and provider acceptance.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2014Article
- Surgical process improvement tools: defining quality gaps and priority areas in gastrointestinal cancer surgery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2014Article
- How can diagnostic assessment programs be implemented to enhance inter-professional collaborative care for cancer?Implementation science : IS · 2014Article
- Perceptions of care coordination in a population-based sample of diverse breast cancer patients.Patient education and counseling · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile many factors can influence the way that cancer care is delivered, including the way that evidence is packaged and disseminated, little research has evaluated how health care professionals who manage cancer patients seek and use this information to identify whether and how this could be supported. Through interviews we identified that general surgeons experience challenges in coordinating care for complex cancer patients whose management is not easily addressed by guidelines, and conducted a population-based survey of general surgeon information needs and information seeking practices to extend these findings.
methodsGeneral surgeons with privileges at acute care hospitals in Ontario, Canada were mailed a questionnaire to solicit information needs (task, importance), information seeking (source, frequency of and reasons for use), key challenges and suggested solutions. Non-responders received up to three reminder packages. Significant differences among sub-groups (age, setting) were examined statistically (Kruskal Wallis, Mann Whitney, Chi Square). Standard qualitative methods were used to thematically analyze open-ended responses.
resultsThe response rate was 44.2% (170/385) representing all 14 health regions. System resource constraints (60.4%), comorbidities (56.4%) and physiologic factors (51.8%) were top-ranked issues creating information needs. Local surgical colleagues (84.6%), other local colleagues (82.2%) and the Internet (81.1%) were top-ranked sources of information, primarily due to familiarity and speed of access. No resources were considered to be highly applicable to patient care. Challenges were related to limitations in diagnostics and staging, operative resources, and systems to support multidisciplinary care, together accounting for 76.0% of all reported issues. Findings did not differ significantly by surgeon age or setting of care.
conclusionGeneral surgeons appear to use a wide range of information resources but they may not address the complex needs of many cancer patients. Decision-making is challenged by informational and logistical issues related to the coordination of multidisciplinary care. This suggests that limitations in system capacity may, in part, contribute to variable guideline compliance. Further research is required to evaluate the appropriateness of information seeking, and both concurrent and consecutive mechanisms by which to achieve multidisciplinary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.