Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19101719›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2009

Tracing and ablation of single cells in the mammalian blastocyst using fluorescent DNA staining and multi-photon laser microscopy.

Tobias Reupke, Bernd Püschel, Christoph Viebahn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tobias ReupkeAbteilung Anatomie und Embryologie, Georg-August-Universität, Kreuzbergring 36, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Bernd Püschel
Christoph Viebahn
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparing the vital DNA dyes Hoechst33342 and DAPI in their ability to visualise cell nuclei of the late rabbit blastocyst, both dyes were found to be equally suited despite differences in staining intensity in embryonic versus extraembryonic tissues and in nuclear versus cytoplasmic domains at the subcellular level: Both dyes stain all nuclei of a given cell layer (e.g. epiblast or hypoblast) evenly and provide satisfactory fluorescence contrast throughout the blastocyst, while not interfering with normal development up to 10 h in vitro. Using short period (60-300 min) irradiation experiments with either dye, single-photon (405 nm) and multi-photon (800 nm) laser excitation was compared in different areas of the same embryo and parameters of multi-photon microscopy were defined for gentle live imaging and tracing of single cells deep to the surface of the embryo. In addition, individual cells were ablated by reducing the "area of interest" to sub-nucleus-size, thus maximally increasing the density of laser energy brought into the tissue. Thickening of epiblast and hypoblast and increased numbers of dense cytoplasmic inclusions within the limits of irradiated areas were found in semithin histological sections in a dose-dependent manner. Ablated cells were found in a necrotic state while neighbouring cells remained apparently unscathed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzimidazolesBlastocystCell MovementCell NucleusDNAEmbryo Culture TechniquesFluorescent DyesIndolesRabbitsBenzimidazolesbisbenzimide ethoxide trihydrochlorideDAPIDNAFluorescent DyesIndoles

Identifiers

PMID19101719
OpenAlexW2004289055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.