Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19101459›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2009

Contraceptive method at first sexual intercourse and subsequent pregnancy risk: findings from a secondary analysis of 16-year-old girls from the RIPPLE and SHARE studies.

Alison Parkes, Daniel Wight, Marion Henderson, Judith Stephenson, Vicki Strange

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Behavioral interventions for improving dual-method contraceptive use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Can Teenage Men Be Targeted to Prevent Teenage Pregnancy? A Feasibility Cluster Randomised Controlled Intervention Trial in Schools.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Associations Between Recent Contraceptive Use and First Sex Behaviors of Scottish Adolescents: A Brief Report.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. LGB-Affirming School Climates and Sexual Health Outcomes Among U.S. High School Students 2015-2017: Differences by Sex and Sexual Identity.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A prospective study of the sexual, emotional, and behavioral correlates associated with young women's first and usual coital events.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alison ParkesMedical Research Council Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. alison-p@sphsu.mrc.ac.uk
Daniel Wight
Marion Henderson
Judith Stephenson
Vicki Strange
University of Glasgow · GBMedical Research Council · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G9626797Medical Research Council MC_UP_A540_1108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExisting failure rate studies indicate that typical use of oral contraception (OC) results in fewer unplanned pregnancies than condom use, even among teenagers. However, comparative data on pregnancy risk associated with different contraceptive methods are lacking for younger teenagers starting their first sexual relationship. This study examined associations between contraceptive method at first intercourse and subsequent pregnancy in 16-year-old girls.

methodsSix thousand three hundred forty-eight female pupils from 51 secondary schools completed a questionnaire at mean age 16 years; 2,501 girls reported sexual intercourse. Logistic regression (N = 1952) was used to model the association of contraceptive method at first intercourse with pregnancy.

resultsAt first intercourse (median age 15 years) 54% reported using condoms only, 11% dual OC and condoms, 4% OC only, 4% emergency contraception, and 21% no effective method. Method used was associated with a similar method at a most recent intercourse. One in 10 girls reported a pregnancy. When compared to use of condoms only, greater pregnancy risk was found with no effective method (odds ratio [OR] 2.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-4.15) or OC only (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.29-4.60). Pregnancy risk for dual use and emergency contraception did not differ from that for condoms only. Both significant effects were partially attenuated by adjusting for user characteristics and sexual activity.

conclusionsYoung teenagers may use OC less efficiently than condoms for pregnancy prevention. The characteristics of those using OC-only confirm vulnerability to unintended pregnancy, and suggest that alternative contraceptive strategies should be considered for these young women.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorContraception BehaviorAdolescentCoitusContraceptionContraceptives, OralFemaleHumansLikelihood FunctionsLogistic ModelsPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceRisk FactorsSex EducationUnited KingdomYoung AdultContraceptives, Oral

Identifiers

PMID19101459
PMCPMC2606907
OpenAlexW2141612267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.