ReviewJournal of chromatography. A2009
Effect of the matrix on DNA electrophoretic mobility.
Review in Journal of chromatography. A, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cyanine-modified ssODNs enhance CRISPR-Cas9 HDR in stem cell embryo models via chromatin and chemical modulation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Microfluidic networks using isotachophoresis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Barcoded screening identifies nanocarriers for protein delivery to kidney.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Differential electrophoretic mobility of synthetic DNA motifs and duplex DNA in various counter ions.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- A high-throughput 384-well CometChip platform reveals a role for 3-methyladenine in the cellular response to etoposide-induced DNA damage.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Regulation of cell attachment, spreading, and migration by hydrogel substrates with independently tunable mesh size.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Article
- HIV detection from human serum with paper-based isotachophoretic RNA extraction and reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification.The Analyst · 2021Article
- Electrode-Free Concentration and Recovery of DNA at Physiologically Relevant Ionic Concentrations.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Simultaneous RNA purification and size selection using on-chip isotachophoresis with an ionic spacer.Lab on a chip · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- A novel 4-arm DNA/RNA Nanoconstruct triggering Rapid Apoptosis of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells within 24 hours.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Topological patterns in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of DNA knots.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- Palindromic genes in the linear mitochondrial genome of the nonphotosynthetic green alga Polytomella magna.Genome biology and evolution · 2013Article
- Probing biomolecular structures and dynamics of single molecules using in-gel alternating-laser excitation.Analytical chemistry · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA electrophoretic mobilities are highly dependent on the nature of the matrix in which the separation takes place. This review describes the effect of the matrix on DNA separations in agarose gels, polyacrylamide gels and solutions containing entangled linear polymers, correlating the electrophoretic mobilities with information obtained from other types of studies. DNA mobilities in various sieving media are determined by the interplay of three factors: the relative size of the DNA molecule with respect to the effective pore size of the matrix, the effect of the electric field on the matrix, and specific interactions of DNA with the matrix during electrophoresis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.