ArticleAtencion primaria2008
[Adaptation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire on medical and nursing care].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05123560 (First-trimester Preeclampsia Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
First-trimester Preeclampsia Screening: Women's Perspectives
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multicomponent, high-intensity, patient-centered care intervention to optimize transitional care coordination for complex multimorbid people: a pre-post design.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- "Gaining or losing": The importance of the perspective in primary care health services valuation.PloS one · 2017Article
- Economic valuation of health care services in public health systems: a study about Willingness to Pay (WTP) for nursing consultations.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCatalan and Spanish adaptation of a questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction with their family doctor and nurse visit.
designDescriptive study of adapting questionnaires.
settingPrimary Care Team Gòtic, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain.
participantsOf all the patients visiting doctors or nurses, 1186 patients were systematically selected. Of these, 341 were excluded using the following criteria: illiteracy, not understanding either language, cognitive impairment, sight, or writing disability. MEASUREMENTS: Two translations of the original questionnaire. Analysis of the pattern of response. Exploratory factor analysis. Correlation item-scale corrected coefficients and Cronbach alpha for each dimension.
resultsThere were 74.8% responses. The percentage of items not answered follows a pattern of declining response. There were 3 dimensions in the factor analysis: care offered by the professional, time devoted to the visit, and depth of the relationship with the professional, where the items weighed the same as in the original questionnaire, except two of them. The item-dimension correlation coefficients were greater than 0.4 except for items number 8 and number 18. The coefficient of internal consistency proved to be greater than 0.7 in all dimensions except in "depth of the relationship," which rises above 0.7 if item number 8 is excluded.
conclusionAdaptation of a valid and reliable questionnaire into Spanish and Catalan is useful for evaluating aspects of the professional care visit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.