Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19099466›Full record

ReviewJournal of natural products2009

Natural products as tools for neuroscience: discovery and development of novel agents to treat drug abuse.

Thomas E Prisinzano

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of natural products, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of the kappa-opioid receptor-selective tracer [(11)C]GR103545 in awake rhesus macaques.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas E PrisinzanoDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA. prisinza@ku.edu
University of Kansas · US

Funding

Investigation of Neoclerodanes as Novel Opioid LigandsR01DA018151 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI PRISINZANO, THOMAS EDWARD · 2005 to 2020
$5.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018151NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA18151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of what we know about the neurosciences is the direct result of studying psychoactive natural products. Unfortunately, there are many gaps in our understanding of the basic biological processes that contribute to the etiology of many CNS disorders. The investigation of psychoactive natural products offers an excellent approach to identify novel agents to treat CNS disorders and to find new chemical tools to better elucidate their biological mechanisms. This review will detail recent progress in a program directed toward investigating psychoactive natural products with the goal of treating drug abuse by targeting kappa opioid receptors.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsNeurosciencesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalMolecular StructureSubstance-Related DisordersBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID19099466
PMCPMC2788013
OpenAlexW2007439149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.