ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2009
[Design and evaluation of the University of Munich courses on research trials].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe growing importance of clinical research in Germany requires physicians who are adequately trained to conduct clinical trials. In November 2007, the Coordination Centre for Surgical Studies at the University of Munich organised its third course for clinical investigators. The course was evaluated by the participants. PARTICIPANTS AND PROGRAMME: Participants included 1st-year residents as well as specialists mostly from surgical departments; many already possessed significant experience with clinical trials. In our course, special emphasis was put on the practical aspects of conducting clinical trials. EVALUATION: On a scale from 1 to 6 (in German grading, 1 is the best score), participants rated content at 1.5, understanding at 1.6, and learning effect at 1.8. Careful preparation and a clearly structured curriculum resulted in significantly better evaluation of this course than of preceding courses (content P=0.015, understanding P=0.007, learning effect P=0.018). DISCUSSION: To realise projects of translational investigation and to participate in interdisciplinary clinical trials, surgeons in academic centres should obtain basic knowledge on clinical and pharmaceutical trials. Participants' statements on their own experience as clinical investigators underline the need for adequate training in this field. This course conveys essential knowledge of good medical practice and critical review of medical literature. We view this knowledge as a basic skill for modern medical practice and have therefore integrated the course into basic surgical training at our department.
conclusionThe concept of training for clinical investigation conducted at a surgical department is well established, and the participants' positive feedback motivates us to continue organising such courses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.