Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19093179›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2008

Comparison of alternate-day versus consecutive-day treatment with S-1: assessment of tumor growth inhibition and toxicity reduction in gastric cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo.

Wataru Arai, Yoshinori Hosoya, Hidenori Haruta, Kentaro Kurashina, Shin Saito, Yuuki Hirashima, Taku Yokoyama, Toru Zuiki, Kazuya Sakuma, Masanobu Hyodo and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Feasibility study of alternate-day S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2014
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wataru AraiDepartment of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan. waraitu@v005.vaio.ne.jp
Yoshinori Hosoya
Hidenori Haruta
Kentaro Kurashina
Shin Saito
Yuuki Hirashima
Taku Yokoyama
Toru Zuiki
Kazuya Sakuma
Masanobu Hyodo
Yoshikazu Yasuda
Hideo Nagai
Tetsuhiko Shirasaka
Jichi Medical University · JPKitasato University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe toxic effects of S-1 can lead to discontinuation of treatment. Strategies for reducing toxicity without compromising therapeutic effectiveness are required.

methodsWe used the human gastric cancer cell lines MKN28 and MKN45 to examine such strategies in vitro. The cell lines were treated with three different regimens, given on alternate days (alternate-day) or on consecutive days (consecutive-day). On consecutive days, treatment A provided the same total dose as the alternate-day treatment, and treatment B was given for the same number of days as the alternate-day treatment. A fourth group served as control. In vitro, the relative inhibition (RI) of tumor growth by 5-fluorouracil was calculated using the 2-(2-methyl-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophyl)-5-2, 4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (WST-8) method. We also carried out an in vivo experiment in which tumor-bearing nude mice (BALBc/nu-nu) were used to examine the antitumor activity of S-1. Leukocyte counts and gastrointestinal mucosal injury were compared in mice that received alternate-day and consecutive-day treatments.

resultsIn vitro, for MKN28, the RI was 22.9% for alternate-day, 34.1% for consecutive-day A, and 37.7% for consecutive-day B treatments. For MKN45, the RI was 51.1% for alternate-day, 52.2% for consecutive-day A, and 50.5% for consecutive-day B treatments. In vivo, for MKN28, the treated groups showed higher inhibition than the control, and inhibition of tumor growth was higher with alternate-day than with consecutive-day treatment. The RI was significantly higher with alternate-day (49.3%) than with consecutive-day treatment (16.2%; P < 0.05). For MKN45, the RI was greater than 50% in both treated groups. With consecutive-day treatment, 5 of the 14 mice used died during treatment. Leukocyte counts were lower in the mice with consecutive-day than with alternate-day treatment, or control. Atrophic changes and inflammatory cell infiltration of the small intestinal mucosa were severe after consecutive-day, but minimal after alternate-day treatment.

conclusionExperimentally, alternate-day treatment with S-1 is equivalent to consecutive-day treatment in terms of RI of tumor growth, with lower toxicity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticApoptosisBone Marrow DiseasesCell ProliferationDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CombinationsFemaleFluorouracilGastrointestinal TractHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeOxonic Acid2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H tetrazolium monosodium saltAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDrug CombinationsFluorouracilOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)TegafurTetrazolium Salts

Identifiers

PMID19093179
OpenAlexW2033853373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.