ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2008
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for the treatment of esophageal carcinoma.
Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment decision support for esophageal cancer based on PET/CT data using deep learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is beneficial for clinical stage T2 N0 esophageal cancer patients due to inaccurate preoperative staging.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2012Review
- Recent advances in chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for gastrointestinal tract cancers.International journal of clinical oncology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection is the standard therapy for esophageal cancer in many countries, including Japan. However, the results of esophagectomy are still unsatisfactory in comparison to the results of surgical treatment for gastric cancer or colon cancer. On the other hand, definitive chemoradiation therapy has recently shown progress as a treatment modality for resectable esophageal cancer, with data indicating the potential efficacy of combination therapy with chemoradiation and an esophagectomy. In fact, preoperative chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer is becoming a standard therapy in Europe and North America. The latest metaanalysis concerning neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer concluded that a significant survival benefit was evident with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. However, there are still no supportive data for neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery from a well-designed large-scale randomized control trial (RCT). A well-designed large-scale RCT is needed to determine the utility of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Future trials based on precise diagnosis and surgical procedures are required for the adequate interpretation of the results of treatment for resectable esophageal cancer. Of course, quality control of the operation is a very important factor, because operative mortality influences these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.