Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19092859›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2009

A phase I trial of intratumoral administration of recombinant oncolytic adenovirus overexpressing HSP70 in advanced solid tumor patients.

J-L Li, H-L Liu, X-R Zhang, J-P Xu, W-K Hu, M Liang, S-Y Chen, F Hu, D-T Chu

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Application of Oncolytic Viruses: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Translation of oncolytic viruses in sarcoma.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Personalizing Oncolytic Immunovirotherapy Approaches.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Step-by-Step Immune Activation for Suicide Gene Therapy Reinforcement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Oncolytic Virotherapy and Microenvironment in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J-L LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Cancer Hospital, Peking, PR China.
H-L Liu
X-R Zhang
J-P Xu
W-K Hu
M Liang
S-Y Chen
F Hu
D-T Chu
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNViva Biotech (China) · CNArmy Medical University · CNBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our pre-clinical studies demonstrated that intratumoral vaccination with a recombinant oncolytic type 2 adenovirus overexpressing the heat shock protein (HSP)70 protein, designated as H103, can inhibit primary and metastatic tumors through enhanced oncolytic activity and HSP-mediated immune responses against shared and mutated tumor antigens. In the pre-clinical studies of local H103 administration, no significant toxicity was observed in the animal trials with mice, cavy or rhesus monkeys. A phase I clinical trial of intratumoral injection of H103 was conducted in the patients with advanced solid tumors. A total of 27 patients were injected intratumorally with H103 in a dose-escalation study from a dose of 2.5 x 10(7) to 3.0 x 10(12) viral particles (VPs). The maximum tolerated dose of H103 was not defined. Two patients developed dose-limiting toxicities of grade III fever at the dose of 1.5 x 10(12) VP and transient grade IV thrombocytopenia at the dose of 3.0 x 10(12) VP. The common adverse events were mainly mild to moderate (grade I/II) in nature, including fever, mild injection-site reaction, leucopenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and hypochromia. The objective response (complete response+partial response) to H103-injected tumors was 11.1% (3/27), and the clinical benefit rate (complete response+partial response+minor response+stable disease) was 48.1%. Interestingly, transient and partial regression of distant, uninjected tumors was observed in three patients. The numbers of immune cells (CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, and natural killer cells) were elevated after H103 administration, but without statistical significance. This phase I trial demonstrates that intratumoral administration of H103 can be safely applied to cancer patients and shows promising clinical antitumor activity, warranting a further clinical investigation.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAdultAgedAntibodies, NeoplasmFemaleHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansInjections, IntralesionalLeukocyte CountMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, NeoplasmHSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19092859
OpenAlexW2015198791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.