ArticleNature clinical practice. Nephrology2009
Predicting thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Article in Nature clinical practice. Nephrology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Elevated plasma D-dimer levels in dermatomyositis patients with cutaneous manifestations.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomarkers that reliably identify or even predict disease manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are needed. In a recent issue of the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Wu and colleagues reported on the predictive value of routine D-dimer measurements for future thromboembolic events in patients enrolled in the Ohio SLE study, a unique prospective, longitudinal evaluation of individuals with recurrently active SLE. As in other disease settings, low D-dimer levels (<0.5 microg/ml) excluded clotting at a given time point and identified a zero risk of future clotting events. Conversely, 42% of patients with a high D-dimer level (>2.0 microg/ml) subsequently experienced a clinically relevant clotting event, in some cases in the absence of antiphospholipid antibodies or lupus anticoagulant. This Practice Point commentary considers whether the D-dimer assay will remain simply a tool to rule out thrombosis in symptomatic patients with SLE or whether it could eventually be used to initiate preventive anticoagulation in asymptomatic patients.
Identifiers
19092793What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.