Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19092029›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2008

The views of doctors on their working lives: a qualitative study.

Ian Watt, Sarah Nettleton, Roger Burrows

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Perceptions of Fertility Physicians Treating Women Undergoing IVF Using an Egg Donation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Doctors on status and respect: a qualitative study.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2013
    Article
  6. Pleasure in medical practice.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ian WattDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK. isw1@york.ac.uk
Sarah Nettleton
Roger Burrows

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe doctors' views on, and responses to, their professional working lives in the UK National Health Service (NHS).

designQualitative study using semi structured interviews. Setting Two district hospitals and primary care settings in the North of England.

participantsFifty-two doctors participated in the study--47 worked in hospital and five worked in general practice.

main outcome measuresQualitative information regarding doctors' views on their working lives.

resultsThe study provided insights into the views of their working lives of a sample of doctors in the NHS. Feelings they articulated contained a number of ambivalences. Feelings about the future were coloured by concerns about the impact of regulatory changes and processes of modernization on the experiential knowledge of doctors.

conclusionsThese insights into doctors' views of their working lives might usefully inform those involved in the planning and overseeing of changes to health service structures and systems.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelProfessional PracticeHumansJob SatisfactionMalePersonnel Staffing and SchedulingPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID19092029
PMCPMC2625381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.