Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19091615›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2009

Risk factors for feline immunodeficiency virus antibody test status in Cats Protection adoption centres (2004).

Jane K Murray, Margaret A Roberts, Elizabeth Skillings, Lisa D Morrow, Timothy J Gruffydd-Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jane K MurrayDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK. jane.murray@bristol.ac.uk
Margaret A Roberts
Elizabeth Skillings
Lisa D Morrow
Timothy J Gruffydd-Jones

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A study was carried out to determine the prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) within a population of cats entering 10 UK adoption centres run by Cats Protection. All cats entering the adoption centres during 2004 were tested for FIV using a rapid enzyme immunoassay antibody test. The overall prevalence of positive test results was 3.1% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.7-3.5%), whilst the prevalence at different adoption centres varied from 0.8% (95% CI 0.1-1.5%) to 6.7% (95% CI 4.9-8.5%). Results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that male cats, stray/feral cats and cats in poor health were at a greater risk of testing positive for FIV than female cats, cats that were relinquished by an owner and cats that were in good/fair health, respectively. No evidence was found for an association between neuter status and FIV test results. This study may help to identify cats that are relinquished to rescue centres with an increased risk of FIV for routine FIV testing.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralCatsConfidence IntervalsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFeline Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeFemaleHealth StatusImmunodeficiency Virus, FelineMaleMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioPrevalenceRisk FactorsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, Viral

Identifiers

PMID19091615
PMCPMC10832827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.