ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Predicting RNA-binding sites of proteins using support vector machines and evolutionary information.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic analysis and prediction of type IV secreted effector proteins by machine learning approaches.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Pooled it
- Machine learning for the prediction of gram-negative bacterial secreted effectors: advances and challenges.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Review
- Enhancing the Feature Representation of Protein Sequence Descriptors in Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025Article
- Twenty years of advances in prediction of nucleic acid-binding residues in protein sequences.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- ALDELE: All-Purpose Deep Learning Toolkits for Predicting the Biocatalytic Activities of Enzymes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- A comprehensive review of protein-centric predictors for biomolecular interactions: from proteins to nucleic acids and beyond.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- RNAincoder: a deep learning-based encoder for RNA and RNA-associated interaction.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- HyperCys: A Structure- and Sequence-Based Predictor of Hyper-Reactive Druggable Cysteines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- HybridRNAbind: prediction of RNA interacting residues across structure-annotated and disorder-annotated proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- PRIP: A Protein-RNA Interface Predictor Based on Semantics of Sequences.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence methods enhance the discovery of RNA interactions.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- PSSMCOOL: a comprehensive R package for generating evolutionary-based descriptors of protein sequences from PSSM profiles.Biology methods & protocols · 2022Article
- Variable selection from a feature representing protein sequences: a case of classification on bacterial type IV secreted effectors.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Comprehensive Survey and Comparative Assessment of RNA-Binding Residue Predictions with Analysis by RNA Type.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- PRIME-3D2D is a 3D2D model to predict binding sites of protein-RNA interaction.Communications biology · 2020Article
- T4SE-XGB: Interpretable Sequence-Based Prediction of Type IV Secreted Effectors Using eXtreme Gradient Boosting Algorithm.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Individually double minimum-distance definition of protein-RNA binding residues and application to structure-based prediction.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2018Article
- A boosting approach for prediction of protein-RNA binding residues.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- APRICOT: an integrated computational pipeline for the sequence-based identification and characterization of RNA-binding proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- DRNApred, fast sequence-based method that accurately predicts and discriminates DNA- and RNA-binding residues.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRNA-protein interaction plays an essential role in several biological processes, such as protein synthesis, gene expression, posttranscriptional regulation and viral infectivity. Identification of RNA-binding sites in proteins provides valuable insights for biologists. However, experimental determination of RNA-protein interaction remains time-consuming and labor-intensive. Thus, computational approaches for prediction of RNA-binding sites in proteins have become highly desirable. Extensive studies of RNA-binding site prediction have led to the development of several methods. However, they could yield low sensitivities in trade-off for high specificities.
resultsWe propose a method, RNAProB, which incorporates a new smoothed position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) encoding scheme with a support vector machine model to predict RNA-binding sites in proteins. Besides the incorporation of evolutionary information from standard PSSM profiles, the proposed smoothed PSSM encoding scheme also considers the correlation and dependency from the neighboring residues for each amino acid in a protein. Experimental results show that smoothed PSSM encoding significantly enhances the prediction performance, especially for sensitivity. Using five-fold cross-validation, our method performs better than the state-of-the-art systems by 4.90%-6.83%, 0.88%-5.33%, and 0.10-0.23 in terms of overall accuracy, specificity, and Matthew's correlation coefficient, respectively. Most notably, compared to other approaches, RNAProB significantly improves sensitivity by 7.0%-26.9% over the benchmark data sets. To prevent data over fitting, a three-way data split procedure is incorporated to estimate the prediction performance. Moreover, physicochemical properties and amino acid preferences of RNA-binding proteins are examined and analyzed.
conclusionOur results demonstrate that smoothed PSSM encoding scheme significantly enhances the performance of RNA-binding site prediction in proteins. This also supports our assumption that smoothed PSSM encoding can better resolve the ambiguity of discriminating between interacting and non-interacting residues by modelling the dependency from surrounding residues. The proposed method can be used in other research areas, such as DNA-binding site prediction, protein-protein interaction, and prediction of posttranslational modification sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.