ArticleCroatian medical journal2008
Cardiovascular risk assessment of Bulgarian urban population: cross-sectional study.
Article in Croatian medical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender differences in premature mortality for cardiovascular disease in India, 2017-18.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular disease risk assessment among patients attending two cardiac clinics in the Ashanti Region of Ghana.Ghana medical journal · 2020Article
- Life expectancy and survival analysis of patients with diabetes compared to the non diabetic population in Bulgaria.PloS one · 2020Article
- May chest pain describe coronary heart disease?Croatian medical journal · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the total cardiovascular risk of the Bulgarian urban population.
methodsA representative sample of Bulgarian urban population (n=3810, response rate 68.3%) from five Bulgarian cities was included in a cross-sectional observation study performed in the period 2005-2007. A detailed cardiovascular risk assessment was performed by general practitioners and a total 10-year risk of a fatal cardiovascular event was estimated according to the European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE, HeartScore.
resultsThere were 48.7% of participants in the high risk group (SCORE > or =5%), 24.3% aged 45-54 and more than half aged 55-64 years. Nearly a quarter of the sample had a total cardiovascular risk of over 10% (SCORE > or =10%), whereas 10.1% of the sample had excessively high cardiovascular risk (SCORE > or =15%). In the 65-75 age group, the prevalence of men with excessively high risk was 46.6%, compared with 6.0% in women (P<0.001). Most of the main cardiovascular risk factors were slightly increased or borderline in comparison with clinical thresholds.
conclusionsCardiovascular risk is high in a large proportion of Bulgarian urban population, especially in men aged over 65. These findings indicate that a comprehensive national strategy and program for management of cardiovascular diseases is urgently needed. The SCORE method can be well implemented if a higher threshold for a high risk group is defined and smaller target population is planned for extensive and expensive high risk preventive measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.