ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2009
Amphiphilic blockers punch through a mutant CLC-0 pore.
Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biophysical and Pharmacological Insights to CLC Chloride Channels.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024Article
- Cobalt ion interaction with TMEM16A calcium-activated chloride channel: Inhibition and potentiation.PloS one · 2020Article
- Comparison of ion transport determinants between a TMEM16 chloride channel and phospholipid scramblase.The Journal of general physiology · 2019Article
- Article
- Electrostatic tuning of the pre- and post-hydrolytic open states in CFTR.The Journal of general physiology · 2017Article
- Modulation of the slow/common gating of CLC channels by intracellular cadmium.The Journal of general physiology · 2015Article
- A designed inhibitor of a CLC antiporter blocks function through a unique binding mode.Chemistry & biology · 2012Article
- Anion currents in yeast K+ transporters (TRK) characterize a structural homologue of ligand-gated ion channels.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2011Article
- Accessibility of the CLC-0 pore to charged methanethiosulfonate reagents.Biophysical journal · 2010Article
- Blocking pore-open mutants of CLC-0 by amphiphilic blockers.The Journal of general physiology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intracellularly applied amphiphilic molecules, such as p-chlorophenoxy acetate (CPA) and octanoate, block various pore-open mutants of CLC-0. The voltage-dependent block of a particular pore-open mutant, E166G, was found to be multiphasic. In symmetrical 140 mM Cl(-), the apparent affinity of the blocker in this mutant increased with a negative membrane potential but, paradoxically, decreased when the negative membrane potential was greater than -80 mV, a phenomenon similar to the blocker "punch-through" shown in many blocker studies of cation channels. To provide further evidence of the punch-through of CPA and octanoate, we studied the dissociation rate of the blocker from the pore by measuring the time constant of relief from the block under various voltage and ionic conditions. Consistent with the voltage dependence of the effect on the steady-state current, the rate of CPA dissociation from the E166G pore reached a minimum at -80 mV in symmetrical 140 mM Cl(-), and the direction of current recovery suggested that the bound CPA in the pore can dissociate into both intracellular and extracellular solutions. Moreover, the CPA dissociation depends upon the Cl(-) reversal potential with a minimal dissociation rate at a voltage 80 mV more negative than the Cl(-) reversal potential. That the shift of the CPA-dissociation rate follows the Cl(-) gradient across the membrane argues that these blockers can indeed punch through the channel pore. Furthermore, a minimal CPA-dissociation rate at a voltage 80 mV more negative than the Cl(-) reversal potential suggests that the outward blocker movement through the CLC-0 pore is more difficult than the inward movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.