ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2009
Blocking pore-open mutants of CLC-0 by amphiphilic blockers.
Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insights into CLC-0's Slow-Gating from Intracellular Proton Inhibition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Biophysical and Pharmacological Insights to CLC Chloride Channels.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024Article
- The role of conformational change and key glutamic acid residues in the ClC-ec1 antiporter.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Divalent Cation Modulation of Ion Permeation in TMEM16 Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Cobalt ion interaction with TMEM16A calcium-activated chloride channel: Inhibition and potentiation.PloS one · 2020Article
- Electrostatic tuning of the pre- and post-hydrolytic open states in CFTR.The Journal of general physiology · 2017Article
- Article
- Calcium-calmodulin does not alter the anion permeability of the mouse TMEM16A calcium-activated chloride channel.The Journal of general physiology · 2014Article
- Article
- On the mechanism of CFTR inhibition by a thiazolidinone derivative.The Journal of general physiology · 2010Article
- Accessibility of the CLC-0 pore to charged methanethiosulfonate reagents.Biophysical journal · 2010Article
- Amphiphilic blockers punch through a mutant CLC-0 pore.The Journal of general physiology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The blockade of CLC-0 chloride channels by p-chlorophenoxy acetate (CPA) has been thought to be state dependent; the conformational change of the channel pore during the "fast gating" alters the CPA binding affinity. Here, we examine the mechanism of CPA blocking in pore-open mutants of CLC-0 in which the residue E166 was replaced by various amino acids. We find that the CPA-blocking affinities depend upon the volume and the hydrophobicity of the side chain of the introduced residue; CPA affinity can vary by three orders of magnitude in these mutants. On the other hand, mutations at the intracellular pore entrance, although affecting the association and dissociation rates of the CPA block, generate only a modest effect on the steady-state blocking affinity. In addition, various amphiphilic compounds, including fatty acids and alkyl sulfonates, can also block the pore-open mutants of CLC-0 through a similar mechanism. The blocking affinity of fatty acids and alkyl sulfonates increases with the length of these amphiphilic blockers, a phenomenon similar to the block of the Shaker K(+) channel by long-chain quaternary ammonium (QA) ions. These observations lead us to propose that the CPA block of the open pore of CLC-0 is similar to the blockade of voltage-gated K(+) channels by long-chain QAs or by the inactivation ball peptide: the blocker first uses the hydrophilic end to "dock" at the pore entrance, and the hydrophobic part of the blocker then enters the pore to interact with a more hydrophobic region of the pore. This blocking mechanism appears to be very general because the block does not require a precise structural fit between the blocker and the pore, and the blocking mechanism applies to the cation and anion channels with unrelated pore architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.