ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2008
DNA copy-number alterations underlie gene expression differences between microsatellite stable and unstable colorectal cancers.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor microenvironment-aware, single-transcriptome prediction of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer using meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Continuity of transcriptomes among colorectal cancer subtypes based on meta-analysis.Genome biology · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Implication of KLHL Gene Family Member KLHL5 in Colorectal Cancer Progression and Prognosis.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Identification of hub genes and potential molecular mechanisms in MSS/MSI classifier primary colorectal cancer based on multiple datasets.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Microsatellite instability states serve as predictive biomarkers for tumors chemotherapy sensitivity.iScience · 2023Article
- Multi-omic analysis in normal colon organoids highlights MSH4 as a novel marker of defective mismatch repair in Lynch syndrome and microsatellite instability.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Characterisation of tumor microenvironment and prevalence of CD274/PD-L1 genetic alterations difference in colorectal Cancer.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Article
- Mex3a marks drug-tolerant persister colorectal cancer cells that mediate relapse after chemotherapy.Nature cancer · 2022Article
- Relationship between ATOH1 and tumor microenvironment in colon adenocarcinoma patients with different microsatellite instability status.Cancer cell international · 2022Article
- Copy Number Alterations as Novel Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Single-cell and spatial analysis reveal interaction of FAPNature communications · 2022Article
- Immune translational control by CPEB4 regulates intestinal inflammation resolution and colorectal cancer development.iScience · 2022Article
- Fusobacterium nucleatum: a new player in regulation of cancer development and therapeutic response.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2022Review
- Article
- Accurate cancer phenotype prediction with AKLIMATE, a stacked kernel learner integrating multimodal genomic data and pathway knowledge.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer: An emerging therapeutic opportunity for personalized medicine.Genes & diseases · 2021Review
- Cross-talk of four types of RNA modification writers defines tumor microenvironment and pharmacogenomic landscape in colorectal cancer.Molecular cancer · 2021Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAbout 15% of colorectal cancers harbor microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI-associated gene expression changes have been identified in colorectal cancers, but little overlap exists between signatures hindering an assessment of overall consistency. Little is known about the causes and downstream effects of differential gene expression. EXPERIMENTAL
designDNA microarray data on 89 MSI and 140 microsatellite-stable (MSS) colorectal cancers from this study and 58 MSI and 77 MSS cases from three published reports were randomly divided into test and training sets. MSI-associated gene expression changes were assessed for cross-study consistency using training samples and validated as MSI classifier using test samples. Differences in biological pathways were identified by functional category analysis. Causation of differential gene expression was investigated by comparison to DNA copy-number data.
resultsMSI-associated gene expression changes in colorectal cancers were found to be highly consistent across multiple studies of primary tumors and cancer cell lines from patients of different ethnicities (P < 0.001). Clustering based on consistent changes separated additional test cases by MSI status, and classification of individual samples predicted MSI status with a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 85%. Genes associated with immune response were up-regulated in MSI cancers, whereas genes associated with cell-cell adhesion, ion binding, and regulation of metabolism were down-regulated. Differential gene expression was shown to reflect systematic differences in DNA copy-number aberrations between MSI and MSS tumors (P < 0.001).
conclusionsOur results show cross-study consistency of MSI-associated gene expression changes in colorectal cancers. DNA copy-number alterations partly cause the differences in gene expression between MSI and MSS cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.