Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19086828›Full record

ReviewBreastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine2008

The heart of the matter on breastmilk and environmental chemicals: essential points for healthcare providers and new parents.

Judy S LaKind, Cheston M Berlin, Donald R Mattison

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. NIH workshop on human milk composition: summary and visions.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2019
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judy S LaKindLaKind Associates, LLC, Catonsville, Maryland, USA.
Cheston M Berlin
Donald R Mattison
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract The increasing number of environmental chemicals measured in breastmilk is a consequence of improved analytical capabilities and the increased interest in biomonitoring. It has been generally concluded that the benefits to the infant from breastfeeding outweigh potential risks associated with environmental chemical exposures associated with breastfeeding. However, there have been reports of subtle effects on infants associated with chemicals in breastmilk. Associations between concentrations of chemicals in breastmilk and a biochemical or other change in infants may signal the need for further study or regulatory action, whereas on an individual level, these changes may not be considered adverse. For healthcare providers, this distinction is critical, as many in the field are being asked for nuanced information on risks and benefits associated with breastfeeding, and this information is not readily available. Recognizing the challenge faced by healthcare providers, we have explored and developed a case study on dioxins in breastmilk. The essential conclusion for healthcare providers and new parents is that in studies of breastfed versus formula-fed infants across time, including times when levels of environmental chemicals such as dioxins were higher, beneficial effects associated with breastfeeding have been found. The current evidence does not support altering the World Health Organization recommendations promoting and supporting breastfeeding.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingPublic HealthPublic PolicyRisk AssessmentCommunicationEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleHumansMilk, HumanEnvironmental Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID19086828
OpenAlexW1965322635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.