ArticleCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2008
Analytical sensitivity of air samplers based on uniform point-source exposure to airborne porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and swine influenza virus.
Article in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Silica-encapsulated DNA tracers for measuring aerosol distribution dynamics in real-world settings.Indoor air · 2022Article
- Aerobiology: Experimental Considerations, Observations, and Future Tools.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2017Review
- Acute BVDV-2 infection in beef calves delays humoral responses to a non-infectious antigen challenge.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2015Article
- Detection of respiratory pathogens in air samples from acutely infected pigs.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research and surveillance activities involving airborne pathogens rely on the capture and enumeration of pathogens suspended in aerosols. The objective of this study was to estimate the analytical sensitivity (detection threshold) of each of 4 air samplers for Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and swine influenza virus (SIV). In a 5-min sampling period under controlled conditions, the analytical sensitivity of the AGI-30 (Ace Glass, Vineland, New Jersey, USA), AGI-4 (Ace Glass), SKC BioSampler (SKC, Eighty Four, Pennsylvania, USA), and Midwest Micro-Tek sampler (Midwest Micro-Tek, Brookings, South Dakota, USA) was calculated at 1 x 10(1.1), 1 x 10(1.3), 1 X 10(1.1), and 1 x 10(1.2) median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) equivalents for PRRSV and 1 x 10(1.4), 1 x 10(1.1), 1 x 10(1.6), and 1 x 10(1.2) TCID50 equivalents for SIV [per 60 L (5-min sampling period)]. Despite marked differences in sampler design, no statistically significant difference in analytical sensitivity was detected between the samplers for collection of artificially produced aerosols containing cell-culture-propagated PRRSV or SIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19086377PMC2568049What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.