Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19085103›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2009

Avoiding pitfalls: what an endoscopist should know in liver transplantation--part II.

Sharad Sharma, Ahmet Gurakar, Cemalettin Camci, Nicolas Jabbour

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Rare gastrointestinal lymphomas: The endoscopic investigation.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sharad SharmaNazih Zuhdi Transplant Institute, 3300 North West Expressway, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA. drsharadsharma@yahoo.com
Ahmet Gurakar
Cemalettin Camci
Nicolas Jabbour
INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center · USOklahoma Blood Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade the number of patients undergoing transplantation has increased. At the same time, effective peri- and postoperative care and better surgical techniques have resulted in greater numbers of recipients achieving long-term survival. Identification and effective management in the form of adequate treatment is essential, since any delay in diagnosis or treatment may result in graft loss or serious threat to patient's life. Various aspects of endoscopic findings that can be commonly encountered among liver transplant recipients are discussed herein. Topics include: persistent and/or recurrent esophageal varices, reflux, Candida or cytomegalovirus (CMV) esophagitis, esophageal neoplasms, posttransplant peptic ulcer, biliary complications, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), Kaposi's sarcoma, CMV colitis and inflammatory bowel disease, colonic neoplasms, Clostridium difficile infection, and graft versus host disease (GVHD).

Indexed as

Endoscopy, Digestive SystemLiver TransplantationBiliary Tract DiseasesCandidiasisClostridium InfectionsColonic NeoplasmsCytomegalovirus InfectionsDigestive System NeoplasmsEsophageal and Gastric VaricesEsophagitis, PepticHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesLiver DiseasesLymphoproliferative DisordersPeptic UlcerPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID19085103
OpenAlexW2079060927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.