Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19085074›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2008

Species identification of Campylobacter jejuni ssp. jejuni and C. coli by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and PCR.

R Kolínská, M Drevínek, V Jakubů, H Zemlicková

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative analysis of Campylobacter isolates from wild birds and chickens using MALDI-TOF MS, biochemical testing, and DNA sequencing.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R KolínskáCzech National Collection of Type Cultures, National Institute of Public Health, 100 42, Prague, Czech Republic.
M Drevínek
V Jakubů
H Zemlicková
National Institute of Public Health · CZNational Institute for Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Protection · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Campylobacter species strains (n = 42; isolated from clinical samples and deposited in Czech National Collection of Type Cultures, Prague) originally phenotypically (and biochemically) identified as Campylobacter jejuni were re-classified using molecular biological and mass spectrometric methods. Whole-cell MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry) separated the isolates into two genetically related strains--C. jejuni (n = 26) and C. coli (n = 16) and, moreover, distinguished the intimate details in the group of tested strains. It also made it possible to create the MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram; similarly, the spectral characteristics were used for the 3D cluster analysis. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed the results obtained by mass spectrometry. Both methods (PCR and MALDI-TOF MS) gave the same results which supports their suitability in the rapid and accurate Campylobacter-species determination.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsCampylobacter coliCampylobacter jejuniCatsDNA, BacterialFecesHumansSpecies SpecificitySpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID19085074
OpenAlexW2108743049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.