ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2009
Prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics in surgery--are they only trendy, truly effective or even dangerous?
Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis: a review of the current evidence.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Evidence-based use of enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2010Pooled it
- Impact of perioperative symbiotic therapy on infectious morbidity after Hpb Surgery in jaundiced patients: a randomized controlled trial.Updates in surgery · 2014Trial
- Timing and Protocols for Microbiome Intervention in Surgical Patients: A Literature Review of Current Evidence.Cureus · 2025Review
- A value chain to improve human, animal and insect health in developing countries.Microbiome research reports · 2024Article
- The Efficacy of Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics in Patients Who Have Undergone Abdominal Operation, in Terms of Bowel Function Post-Operatively: A Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Avoidance of milk and dairy products after oral surgery-is such a recommendation still valid? A cross-sectional study among German and international oral and maxillofacial surgeons and dental practitioners with review of the literature.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2022Review
- Hydrogen sulfide toxicity in the gut environment: Meta-analysis of sulfate-reducing and lactic acid bacteria in inflammatory processes.Journal of advanced research · 2021Review
- Effects of Perioperative Probiotics and Synbiotics on Pancreaticoduodenectomy Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Hydrogen Sulfide Effects on the Survival of Lactobacilli with Emphasis on the Development of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Biomolecules · 2019Article
- Impact of perioperative enteral synbiotics in hepatic and pancreatic surgery: design and rationale of a single blind placebo controlled prospective randomised control trial.Frontline gastroenterology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite advances in surgical technique and intensive care medicine, nosocomial bacterial infections frequently occur in patients after major abdominal surgery and have a negative impact on operative outcome and hospital costs. In parallel, the routine use of antibiotics led to the development of resistance. Some probiotics (living bacteria) and prebiotics (fibers) are able to stabilize the intestinal barrier and prevent bacterial translocation and infections. The aim of this article was to review all available experience with pro- and prebiotics in surgical trials. MATERIALS AND
methodsMedical databases were searched for animal trials and randomized controlled studies with pro- and prebiotics in surgical patients. Primary endpoint of all reported studies was the occurrence of bacterial infections. In addition, type and concentration of the pro- and prebiotics, duration of therapy, adverse events, and other effects were investigated.
resultsIn three animal trials and in ten of the 15 clinical studies, probiotics or synbiotics led to a significant reduction of bacterial infection rates compared to the control groups. In two studies, there was a positive trend in the groups with synbiotics, but the results were not statistically significant. Two studies showed no effect, and in one study, the mortality rate was even higher in the synbiotic group. Except in the latter study, no severe adverse events were observed. The success of treatment depends on the synbiotic preparation and the length of therapy. Patients after surgery of the liver and pancreas and multiple trauma patients profited most from synbiotic treatment.
conclusionThe existing randomized controlled trials demonstrated a positive effect of synbiotics in patients with high-risk operations; however, synbiotic preparations should be extensively tested before using them in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.