Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19084067›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cancer biology2009

Chemokine receptor CXCR4 as a therapeutic target for neuroectodermal tumors.

Hyunsuk Shim, Shinya Oishi, Nobutaka Fujii

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cancer biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current molecular imaging positron emitting radiotracers in oncology.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2011
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyunsuk ShimDepartment of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Shinya Oishi
Nobutaka Fujii
Kyoto University · JPEmory University · US

Funding

Development of anti-CXCR4 compounds as anti-metastatic, angiogenic drugR01CA109366 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SHIM, HYUNSUK · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA109366NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemokines (chemotactic cytokines) are a family of proteins associated with the trafficking and activation of leukocytes and other cell types in immune surveillance and inflammatory response. Besides their roles in the immune system, they play pleiotropic roles in tumor initiation, promotion, and progression. Chemokines can be classified into four subfamilies of chemokines, CXC, CC, C, or CX3C, based on their number and spacing of conserved cysteine residues near the N-terminus. This CXC subfamily can be further subclassified into two groups, depending on the presence or absence of a tripeptide motif glutamic acid-leucine-arginine (ELR) in the N-terminal domain. ELR(-)CXCL12, which binds to CXCR4 has been frequently implicated in various cancers. Over the past several years, studies have increasingly shown that the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis plays critical roles in tumor progression, such as invasion, angiogenesis, survival, homing to metastatic sites. This review focuses on involvement of CXCR4/CXCL12 interaction in neuroectodermal cancers and their therapeutic potentials. As an attractive therapeutic target of CXCR4/CXCL12 axis for cancer chemotherapy, development history and application of CXCR4 antagonists are described.

Indexed as

AnimalsChemokine CXCL12HumansNeuroectodermal TumorsReceptors, CXCR4Chemokine CXCL12Receptors, CXCR4

Identifiers

PMID19084067
PMCPMC3091135
OpenAlexW2089071978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.