Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19084024›Full record

ReviewJournal of theoretical biology2009

Scaling aspects of lymphocyte trafficking.

Alan S Perelson, Frederik W Wiegel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of theoretical biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Grade Regulatory CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Regulatory T-cell therapy in transplantation: moving to the clinic.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2013
    Review
  16. Quantifying T lymphocyte turnover.Journal of theoretical biology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alan S PerelsonTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA. asp@lanl.gov
Frederik W Wiegel

Funding

Modeling Viral and T Lymphocyte DynamicsR01OD011095 · OD · TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC · PI PERELSON, ALAN S · 2012 to 2024
$5.0M
MODELING VIRAL AND T LYMPHOCYTE DYNAMICSR01RR006555 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LOS ALAMOS NAT LAB · PI PERELSON, ALAN S · 1991 to 2011
$3.9M
Immune System Modeling/HIVR01AI028433 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LOS ALAMOS NAT LAB · PI PERELSON, ALAN S · 1990 to 2021
$3.7M
Immune System Modeling/HIVR37AI028433 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LOS ALAMOS NAT LAB · PI PERELSON, ALAN S · 2002 to 2011
$2.4M
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR006555NCRR NIH HHS RR0655NIAID NIH HHS AI28433NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI028433NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI028433NIH HHS R01 OD011095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider the long lived pool of B and T cells that recirculate through blood, tissues and the lymphatic system of an animal with body mass M. We derive scaling rules (allometric relations) for: (1) the rate of production of mature lymphocytes, (2) the accumulation of lymphocytes in the tissues, (3) the flux of lymphocytes through the lymphatic system, (4) the number of lymph nodes, (5) the number of lymphocytes per clone within a lymph node, and (6) the total number of lymphocytes within a lymph node. Mass-dependent aspects of immune learning and of the immunological self are shown to be not very significant. Our treatment is somewhat heuristic and aims at combining immunological data with recent progress in biological scaling.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalAnimalsBody WeightBone MarrowCell MovementImmunologic MemoryLymphatic SystemLymph NodesLymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID19084024
PMCPMC2878816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.