ArticleDer Anaesthesist2009
[Time delay in beginning first OR positions in the morning].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Delayed incision time of the first case : Analysis of incidences and causes and the effect of list planning instability].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Article
- Case delay in the OR morning start in hospitals of different size and academic status : Results from a German multicenter study to identify incidence and causes of delayed anesthesia ready time.Der Anaesthesist · 2021Article
- [Performance development of a university operating room after implementation of a central operating room management].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Article
- [How many patient transfer rooms are necessary for my OR suite? : Effect of the number of OR transfer rooms on waiting times and patient throughput in the OR - analysis by simulation].Der Anaesthesist · 2015Article
- Correspondence (reply): In reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2013Article
- Delays in starting morning operating lists: an analysis of more than 20,000 cases in 22 German hospitals.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delayed starts of operation room (OR) processes in the morning lead to suboptimal use of expensive OR personnel and resources. Therefore, the anaesthesiologist has to take care that anaesthesia preparation and induction are finished in time and the patients are ready for the surgical intervention according to the OR time schedule. However, if the anaesthesiologist starts too early, preincision waiting periods occur. The literature provides little data regarding the complex interaction of anaesthesia process times and delayed operation starts in the morning. In this prospective study 710 first operation positions in the morning were analyzed with respect to the incidence of and reasons for delayed finishing of anaesthesia induction and investigated the interaction of early and late finishing of anaesthesia induction. In 27.5% of anaesthesia inductions the preset time schedule was not reached and the average delay was 19.3+/-17.2 min. The main anaesthesia-dependent reasons for delays were complex anaesthesia inductions with difficult line placement. Also organizational difficulties such as changes in the OR case schedule and delayed patient transport were of major importance. The results of a simulation model showed that in 100% of the cases finishing anaesthesia induction in time would only be feasible if anaesthesia processes started much earlier. However, this would lead to a sharp increase in preincision waiting time with the patient being under anaesthesia but surgeons not ready to start, therefore having only a minor effect on surgical waiting time. Subsequently, on-time anaesthesia induction in all cases is not a reasonable target in OR management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19082986What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.