Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19082824›Full record

ArticleImmunogenetics2009

Comparative in vivo infection models yield insights on early host immune response to Campylobacter in chickens.

Kieran G Meade, Fernando Narciandi, Sarah Cahalane, Carla Reiman, Brenda Allan, Cliona O'Farrelly

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Immunogenetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Preharvest Control ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Intestinal Colonization ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Leukocyte Response toMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  7. Effects ofFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Veterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. A Systematic Review ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  11. Long-Term Grow-Out AffectsFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review on Stress Tolerance inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  17. EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact ofInfection and immunity · 2019
    Article
  20. The Preliminary Development of anFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kieran G MeadeComparative Immunology Group, School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Fernando Narciandi
Sarah Cahalane
Carla Reiman
Brenda Allan
Cliona O'Farrelly

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonella typhimurium and Campylobacter jejuni pose significant risks to human health and poultry are a major vector for infection. Comparative in vivo infection models were performed to compare the avian host immune response to both bacterial species. Forty-five commercial broiler chickens were orally challenged with either C. jejuni or S. typhimurium whilst 60 similar control birds were mock challenged in parallel. Birds were sacrificed at 0, 6, 20 and 48 h post-infection and cloacal swabs, blood and tissue samples taken. Peripheral blood leukocytes were isolated for flow cytometric analyses and RNA was extracted for gene expression profiling. Colonisation patterns were markedly different between the two bacterial species, with systemic colonisation of Campylobacter outside the gastrointestinal tract. Salmonella infection induced significant changes in circulating heterophil and monocyte/macrophage populations, whilst Campylobacter infection had no effect on the heterophil numbers but caused a significant early increase in circulating monocytes/macrophages. Toll-like receptor 1 (TLR1) gene expression was decreased, and avian beta-defensin (AvBD) gene expression (AvBD3, AvBD10 and AvBD12) was significantly increased in response to Salmonella infection (P < 0.05). In contrast, Campylobacter infection induced increased TLR21 gene expression but significantly reduced expression of seven antimicrobial peptide (AMP) genes (AvBD3, AvBD4, AvBD8, AvBD13, AvBD14, CTHL2 and CTHL3; P < 0.05). Considered together, microbiological, cellular and gene expression profiles indicate that the innate immune system responds differently to Salmonella and to Campylobacter infection. Furthermore, reduction in the expression of AMPs may play a role in the persistence of high level colonisation of the host by Campylobacter.

Indexed as

Animalsbeta-DefensinsCampylobacter InfectionsCampylobacter jejuniChickensGastrointestinal TractGene Expression ProfilingGranulocytesLeukocyte CountLiverMacrophagesMonocytesPoultry DiseasesSalmonella Infections, AnimalSalmonella typhimuriumSpleenbeta-DefensinsToll-Like Receptor 1

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.