Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19082769›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2009

Data deposition and annotation at the worldwide protein data bank.

Shuchismita Dutta, Kyle Burkhardt, Jasmine Young, Ganesh J Swaminathan, Takanori Matsuura, Kim Henrick, Haruki Nakamura, Helen M Berman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structural Characterization of Peptide Antibodies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  2. The Interactome of Protein, DNA, and RNA.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Journal of applied crystallography · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Validation of Structures in the Protein Data Bank.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shuchismita DuttaResearch Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB), Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8087, USA.
Kyle Burkhardt
Jasmine Young
Ganesh J Swaminathan
Takanori Matsuura
Kim Henrick
Haruki Nakamura
Helen M Berman

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilNLM NIH HHS LM05799Wellcome Trust GR062025MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Protein Data Bank (PDB) is the repository for three-dimensional structures of biological macromolecules, determined by experimental methods. The data in the archive is free and easily available via the Internet from any of the worldwide centers managing this global archive. These data are used by scientists, researchers, bioinformatics specialists, educators, students, and general audiences to understand biological phenomenon at a molecular level. Analysis of this structural data also inspires and facilitates new discoveries in science. This chapter describes the tools and methods currently used for deposition, processing, and release of data in the PDB. References to future enhancements are also included.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinComputational BiologyDocumentationInformation Storage and RetrievalProteinsReproducibility of ResultsProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.