ArticleInternational journal of oncology2009
An integrative genomic and proteomic approach to chemosensitivity prediction.
Article in International journal of oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative analysis of SEC13: a prognostic predictor and immunotherapeutic target.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Review
- Downregulation of zinc finger protein 71 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma tissues and its potential molecular mechanism and clinical significance: a study based on immunohistochemistry staining and data mining.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Immune-Omics Networks ofCancers · 2021Article
- Identification of Prognostic and Chemopredictive microRNAs for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer by Integrating SEER-Medicare Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Molecular Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Distinct tumor microenvironments of lytic and blastic bone metastases in prostate cancer patients.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2019Article
- Natural Compounds as Anticancer Agents Targeting DNA Topoisomerases.Current genomics · 2017Review
- Multiple-platform data integration method with application to combined analysis of microarray and proteomic data.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in esophageal cancer using ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2012Article
- Reverse phase protein microarrays advance to use in clinical trials.Molecular oncology · 2010Review
- Hybrid models identified a 12-gene signature for lung cancer prognosis and chemoresponse prediction.PloS one · 2010Article
- A population-based gene signature is predictive of breast cancer survival and chemoresponse.International journal of oncology · 2010Article
- Integrative analysis of proteomic signatures, mutations, and drug responsiveness in the NCI 60 cancer cell line set.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2010Article
- Pharmacogenomic discovery using cell-based models.Pharmacological reviews · 2009Review
- Cytokeratins 18 and 8 are poor prognostic markers in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus.British journal of cancer · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New computational approaches are needed to integrate both protein expression and gene expression profiles, extending beyond the correlation analyses of gene and protein expression profiles in the current practices. Here, we developed an algorithm to classify cell line chemosensitivity based on integrated transcriptional and proteomic profiles. We sought to determine whether a combination of gene and protein expression profiles of untreated cells was able to enhance the performance of chemosensitivity prediction. An integrative feature selection scheme was employed to identify chemosensitivity determinants from genome-wide transcriptional profiles and 52 protein expression levels in 60 human cancer cell lines (the NCI-60). A set of 118 anti-cancer drugs whose mechanisms of action were putatively understood was evaluated. Classifiers of the complete range of drug response (sensitive, intermediate, or resistant) were generated for the evaluated anti-cancer drugs, one for each agent. The classifiers were designed to be independent of the cells' tissue origins. The classification accuracy of all the evaluated 118 agents was remarkably better (P<0.001) than that would be achieved by chance. Furthermore, 76 out of the 118 classifiers identified from integrated genomic and protein profiles significantly (P<0.05) improved the accuracy of protein expression-based classifiers identified previously. These results demonstrate that our integrated genomic and proteomic approach enhances the performance of chemosensitivity prediction. This study presents a new analytical framework to identify integrated gene and protein expression signatures for predicting cellular behavior and clinical outcome in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.