Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19082483›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of oncology2009

An integrative genomic and proteomic approach to chemosensitivity prediction.

Yan Ma, Zhenyu Ding, Yong Qian, Ying-Wooi Wan, Kursad Tosun, Xianglin Shi, Vincent Castranova, E James Harner, Nancy L Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrative analysis of SEC13: a prognostic predictor and immunotherapeutic target.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yan MaMary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-9300, USA.
Zhenyu Ding
Yong Qian
Ying-Wooi Wan
Kursad Tosun
Xianglin Shi
Vincent Castranova
E James Harner
Nancy L Guo

Funding

THE ROLE OF HEF1 PROTEIN IN INVASION OF METASTATIC BREAST CANCERP20RR016440 · NCRR · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI CUFF, CHRISTOPHER F · 2001 to 2010
$22.8M
Mechanisms of As-Induced CarcinogenesisR01CA119028 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SHI, XIANGLIN · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
A Novel Computational Framework for Individualized Clinical Decision-MakingR01LM009500 · NLM · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, NANCY LAN · 2008 to 2010
$987k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA119028-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA119028NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016440NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR16440-03NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New computational approaches are needed to integrate both protein expression and gene expression profiles, extending beyond the correlation analyses of gene and protein expression profiles in the current practices. Here, we developed an algorithm to classify cell line chemosensitivity based on integrated transcriptional and proteomic profiles. We sought to determine whether a combination of gene and protein expression profiles of untreated cells was able to enhance the performance of chemosensitivity prediction. An integrative feature selection scheme was employed to identify chemosensitivity determinants from genome-wide transcriptional profiles and 52 protein expression levels in 60 human cancer cell lines (the NCI-60). A set of 118 anti-cancer drugs whose mechanisms of action were putatively understood was evaluated. Classifiers of the complete range of drug response (sensitive, intermediate, or resistant) were generated for the evaluated anti-cancer drugs, one for each agent. The classifiers were designed to be independent of the cells' tissue origins. The classification accuracy of all the evaluated 118 agents was remarkably better (P<0.001) than that would be achieved by chance. Furthermore, 76 out of the 118 classifiers identified from integrated genomic and protein profiles significantly (P<0.05) improved the accuracy of protein expression-based classifiers identified previously. These results demonstrate that our integrated genomic and proteomic approach enhances the performance of chemosensitivity prediction. This study presents a new analytical framework to identify integrated gene and protein expression signatures for predicting cellular behavior and clinical outcome in general.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansNeoplasm ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPredictive Value of TestsProteomicsTranscription, GeneticTumor Cells, CulturedAntineoplastic AgentsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19082483
PMCPMC2667126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.