Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19081797›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2007

The Role of Glycocalyx in Nanocarrier-Cell Adhesion Investigated Using a Thermodynamic Model and Monte Carlo Simulations.

Neeraj J Agrawal, Ravi Radhakrishnan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Selective Integrin αMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Modelling of Binding Free Energy of Targeted Nanocarriers to Cell Surface.Heat and mass transfer = Warme- und Stoffubertragung · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neeraj J AgrawalChemical and Biomolecular Engineering and Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, 240 Skirkanich Hall, 210 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Ravi Radhakrishnan
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

YEAST ER MOLECULAR CHAPERONE TRANSLOCATION: GENOME DATABANK HOMOLOGSP41RR006009 · NCRR · MELLON PITTS CORPORATION (MPC CORP) · PI KNOLL, ERIC · 1990 to 2011
$22.0M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR006009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an equilibrium model for quantifying the effect of glycocalyx in mediating the interaction of functionalized nanocarriers with endothelial cells. In this model, nanocarrier adhesion is governed by the interplay between three physical parameters, namely, glycocalyx resistance, flexural rigidity of receptors, and receptor-ligand bond stiffness. We describe a procedure to rationally determine the values of these crucial parameters based on several independent (single molecule and cell-based) characterizing experiments. Using our model and independent derivation of the parameter values in conjunction with Monte Carlo simulations, we describe the binding of nanocarriers to endothelial cells at equilibrium. We show that we can quantitatively reproduce the experimental binding affinities with zero fitting to binding data. Additionally, our simulations provide quantitative descriptions for the multivalency in nanocarrier binding, as well as for the degree of clustering of antigens. Our study identifies two interesting parameters: glycocalyx resistance and antigen flexural rigidity, both of which reduce binding of nanocarriers and alter the sensitivity of the nanocarrier binding constant to changes in temperature. Collectively, our model, parameter estimations, simulations, and sensitivity analyses help provide unified molecular and energetic analyses of the nanocarrier binding process.

Identifiers

PMID19081797
PMCPMC2600419
OpenAlexW2171649228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.