Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19080758›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2009

Inclusion body myositis: review of recent literature.

Steven A Greenberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A Caenorhabditis elegans model system for amylopathy study.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2013
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Inclusion body myositis: therapeutic approaches.Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease · 2012
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Inflammatory myopathies.Current treatment options in neurology · 2011
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Clinical applications of intravenous immunoglobulins in neurology.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2009
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven A GreenbergDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital,75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA. sagreenberg@partners.org

Funding

Gene Expression in Inflammatory MyopathiesR01NS043471 · NINDS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GREENBERG, STEVEN A · 2003 to 2005
$1.1M
Proteomic Studies in Inclusion Body MyositisR21NS057225 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI GREENBERG, STEVEN A · 2008 to 2009
$433k
NINDS NIH HHS R01NS43471NINDS NIH HHS R21NS057225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inclusion body myositis (IBM) is a progressive inflammatory skeletal muscle disease of unknown cause and without effective treatment. This article discusses existing literature, emphasizing disease mechanisms and models. In particular, it addresses limitations in the beta-amyloid-mediated theory of IBM myofiber injury, flawed rationales of animal models of this disease, and recent reports regarding treatment.

Indexed as

Myositis, Inclusion BodyAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnimalsHumansImmune SystemMuscle ProteinsReview Literature as TopicAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorMuscle Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.