Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19079754›Full record

ArticlePhysica A2006

Transport of a 1D viscoelastic actin-myosin strip of gel as a model of a crawling cell.

Kamila Larripa, Alex Mogilner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica A, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nonlinear Stability in a Free Boundary Model of Active Locomotion.Archive for rational mechanics and analysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. On a poroviscoelastic model for cell crawling.Journal of mathematical biology · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Migration of cells in a social context.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Coupling actin flow, adhesion, and morphology in a computational cell motility model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Computational model for cell morphodynamics.Physical review letters · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kamila LarripaDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Alex Mogilner

Funding

STRUCTUREU54GM064346 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI IMPERIALI, BARBARA · 2001 to 2010
$74.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM064346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell crawling is an important biological phenomenon because it underlies coordinated cell movement in morphogenesis, cancer and wound healing. This phenomenon is based on protrusion at the cell's leading edge, retraction at the rear, contraction and graded adhesion powered by the dynamics of actin and myosin protein networks. A few one-dimensional models successfully explain an anteroposterior organization of the motile cell, but don't sufficiently explore the viscoelastic nature of the actin-myosin gel. We develop and numerically solve a model of a treadmilling strip of viscoelastic actin-myosin gel. The results show that the strip translocates steadily as a traveling pulse, without changing length, and that protein densities, velocities and stresses become stationary. The simulations closely match the observed forces, movements and protein distributions in the living cell.

Identifiers

PMID19079754
PMCPMC2600887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.