ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2008
Residual cancer burden in locally advanced breast cancer: a superior tool.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- To Assess the Predictive and Prognostic Role of PD-L1 and CD8 Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Investigating the optimal timing for the ultrasound prediction of a pathologic complete response in neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Exploring Real-World HER2-Low Data in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Insights and Implications.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2023Article
- Biomarker Dynamics and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients with Residual Cancer Burden after Neoadjuvant Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Integrative oncology: Addressing the global challenges of cancer prevention and treatment.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2022Review
- Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Assessing the Role of Immunohistochemical Biomarkers on Neoadjuvant Treatment.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2021Article
- Prognostic Influence of Residual Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Subtype After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Morphological Estimation of Cellularity on Neo-Adjuvant Treated Breast Cancer Histological Images.Journal of imaging · 2020Article
- Predictive and Prognostic Roles of Pathological Indicators for Patients with Breast Cancer on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of breast cancer · 2019Review
- Automated and Manual Quantification of Tumour Cellularity in Digital Slides for Tumour Burden Assessment.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Intra-arterial interventional therapy for inoperable local advanced breast cancer: A retrospective study.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Automatic cellularity assessment from post-treated breast surgical specimens.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2017Article
- Tissue and Serum miRNA Profile in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) in Response to Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) Treatment.PloS one · 2016Article
- ⁹⁹mTc-3PRGD₂ SPECT to monitor early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2015Article
- Management of locally advanced breast cancer-perspectives and future directions.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2015Review
- Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL.Radiology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLocally advanced breast cancer (LABC) poses a difficult clinical challenge with an overall poor long-term prognosis. The strength of the association between tumour characteristics, treatment response, and outcome is not well defined. In the present study, we attempted to gain further insight into LABC by reviewing tumour characteristics of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and by studying the association of those characteristics with outcome. We calculated the residual cancer burden (RCB) score obtained at surgery and attempted to study its correlation with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).
methodsWe studied patients diagnosed primarily with LABC (n = 45). Pathologic and clinical responses were determined. Pathology slides were reviewed.
resultsOf the 45 study patients, 9% had stage IIB disease; 29%, stage IIIA; 51%, stage IIIB; and 11%, stage IIIC. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) was found in 16%. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved in 22% of all patients. None of the patients with ibc achieved pcr. Patients with estrogen receptor-negative (ER-)/progesterone receptor-negative (PR-) tumours were more likely to achieve pcr than were those with ER+/PR+ tumours. Among patients with tumours that overexpressed human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu), 17% achieved pCR as compared with 25% of patients with non-overexpressing tumours; only 1 patient had received trastuzumab. The RCB scores were calculated in 32 patients and ranged between 0 and 4.6.
conclusionsThe present study examined practical issues related to the classification and management of LABC and IBC. The RCB, defined from routine pathology materials, was easily quantifiable. It appears to be a better predictor than pCR of outcome following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LABC. Higher RCB scores were associated with lower efs and a lower rate of os. A continual quest for reliable predictive and correlative prognostic markers, and for better surrogate endpoints for outcome, is essential to advance our understanding of LABC and to improve treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.