Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19079354›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2009

Doomsday postponed? Preventing and reversing epidemics of drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Christopher Dye

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Spontaneous Selection ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  6. Metabolic Changes ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Tuberculosis vaccine types and timings.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher DyeWorld Health Organization, Geneva 27, Switzerland. dyec@who.int
World Health Organization · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, now known to be present in 50 countries, heighten the threat posed by untreatable and fatal human tuberculosis (TB). To combat epidemics of drug-resistant TB, it is vital to understand why some resistant strains have greater reproductive fitness--a greater propensity to spread--than drug-susceptible strains. If public health malpractice has been a more important determinant of reproductive success than genetic mechanisms, then improved diagnosis and treatment could keep the frequency of resistant strains among TB cases low in any population. Recent data suggest that national TB control programmes that use existing drugs efficiently can postpone and even reverse epidemics of multidrug-resistant TB, although the effect of such programmes on XDR strains remains largely unknown.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAntitubercular AgentsCommunicable Disease ControlExtensively Drug-Resistant TuberculosisHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisNational Health ProgramsAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID19079354
OpenAlexW2039951087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.