Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19079316›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2009

A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing PCR-based and empirical treatment with liposomal amphotericin B in patients after allo-SCT.

H Hebart, L Klingspor, T Klingebiel, J Loeffler, J Tollemar, P Ljungman, H Wandt, K Schaefer-Eckart, H J Dornbusch, C Meisner and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Guideline
  3. Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Liposomal amphotericin B-the present.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

H HebartDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Internal Medicine II, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany. holger.hebart@klinikum-sgd.de
L Klingspor
T Klingebiel
J Loeffler
J Tollemar
P Ljungman
H Wandt
K Schaefer-Eckart
H J Dornbusch
C Meisner
C Engel
N Stenger
T Mayer
O Ringden
H Einsele
Karolinska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Tübingen · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKarolinska Institutet · SEMedical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the efficacy and safety of empirical plus PCR-based vs empirical liposomal amphotericin B treatment after Allo-SCT. Allo-SCT recipients were randomized to receive either PCR-based preemptive therapy (group A; n=198) or empirical antifungal therapy (group B; n=211) with liposomal amphotericin B. In group A, therapy was started after one positive PCR result or after 120 h of febrile neutropenia refractory to broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy. In group B, liposomal amphotericin B was started after 120 h of refractory febrile neutropenia. Demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced. A total of 112 (57.1%) patients in group A and 76 (36.7%) patients in group B received antifungal therapy (P<0.0001). Twelve patients in group A and 16 patients in group B developed proven invasive fungal infection (IFI). Survival curves showed better survival until day 30 when close PCR monitoring was performed (mortality 1.5 vs 6.3%; P=0.015), but there was no difference at day 100. At day 100, no difference was observed in the incidence of IFI (primary end point) and survival between the two arms. Further studies are required to assess the benefit of using PCR in patients after SCT.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAdolescentAdultAgedAmphotericin BChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLiposomesMaleMiddle AgedMycosesPolymerase Chain ReactionSurvival AnalysisAmphotericin Bliposomal amphotericin BLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID19079316
OpenAlexW2049717699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.