ReviewBone marrow transplantation2009
In pursuit of the allo-immune response in multiple myeloma: where do we go from here?
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AlloSCT is a potentially curative procedure for haematological malignancies and marrow failure syndromes. However, unlike leukaemia and lymphoproliferative disorders, AlloSCT has yet to find its place in the clinical management of patients with multiple myeloma. AlloSCT in multiple myeloma is associated with a high procedure-related mortality (TRM up to 35%) when full-intensity conditioning is used and only up to 36% of cases show long-term disease-free survival. The introduction of reduced intensity conditioning AlloSCT, more recently following an autologous SCT, has reduced the TRM to <20%, but there is an associated increased relapse risk. The use of donor lymphocyte infusions and novel biological agents (thalidomide, bortezomib), alone or together, can be effective in relapsed and even persistent disease post-AlloSCT. Thus, in pursuit of the putative graft-versus-myeloma effect, we need to consider the whole patient management pathway both preceding (depth of response to novel agents) and post-AlloSCT, to minimize the toxicity while harnessing the adoptive immunotherapy effect. This review sets out what we have learned to date from the clinical research studies in this area, examines concepts for improving the outcomes of AlloSCT and proposes a potential direction of clinical investigation to maximize the effect of AlloSCT in multiple myeloma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.