Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19077268›Full record

ArticleBMC pharmacology2008

Flexible modulation of agonist efficacy at the human A3 adenosine receptor by the imidazoquinoline allosteric enhancer LUF6000.

Zhan-Guo Gao, Kai Ye, Anikó Göblyös, Adriaan P Ijzerman, Kenneth A Jacobson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. From empirical screening to lipid trolling: the evolution of extrahelical allosteric modulators of AMedicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  3. Bitopic AJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Extrahelical Binding Site for a 1Molecular pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  5. Species dependence of APurinergic signalling · 2023
    Review
  6. Structure-Activity Studies of 1Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  7. Assessment of biased agonism at the ABiochemical pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. AMedicinal research reviews · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Allosteric modulation of purine and pyrimidine receptors.Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2011
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhan-Guo GaoMolecular Recognition Section, Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0810, USA. zg21o@nih.gov
Kai Ye
Anikó Göblyös
Adriaan P Ijzerman
Kenneth A Jacobson
Leiden University · NLNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA series of 1H-imidazo- [4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine derivatives, represented by LUF6000 (N-(3,4-dichloro-phenyl)-2-cyclohexyl-1H-imidazo [4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine), are allosteric modulators of the human A3 adenosine receptor (AR). Here we studied the modulation by LUF6000 of the maximum effect (Emax) of structurally diverse agonists at the A3 AR stably expressed in CHO cells.

resultsIn an assay of [35S]GTPgammaS binding, the Emax of the A3 AR agonist Cl-IB-MECA at the A3 AR was lower than that of the non-selective AR agonist NECA. LUF6000 exerted an Emax-enhancing effect at a concentration of 0.1 microM or higher, and was shown to increase the Emax of Cl-IB-MECA and other low-efficacy agonists to a larger extent than that of the high-efficacy agonist NECA. Interestingly, LUF6000 converted a nucleoside A3 AR antagonist MRS542, but not a non-nucleoside antagonist MRS1220, into an agonist. LUF6000 alone did not show any effect. Mathematical modeling was performed to explain the differential effects of LUF6000 on agonists with various Emax. A simple explanation for the observation that LUF6000 has a much stronger effect on Cl-IB-MECA than on NECA derived from the mathematical modeling is that NECA has relatively strong intrinsic efficacy, such that the response is already close to the maximum response. Therefore, LUF6000 cannot enhance Emax much further.

conclusionLUF6000 was found to be an allosteric enhancer of Emax of structurally diverse agonists at the A3 AR, being more effective for low-Emax agonists than for high-Emax agonists. LUF6000 was demonstrated to convert an antagonist into an agonist, which represents the first example in G protein-coupled receptors. The observations from the present study are consistent with that predicted by mathematical modeling.

Indexed as

Adenosine A3 Receptor AgonistsAdenosine A3 Receptor AntagonistsAdenosineAdenosine-5'-(N-ethylcarboxamide)Allosteric RegulationAminoquinolinesAnimalsBinding, CompetitiveCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusGuanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate)HumansImidazolesModels, TheoreticalRadioligand Assay2-chloro-N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamideAdenosineAdenosine-5'-(N-ethylcarboxamide)Adenosine A3 Receptor AgonistsAdenosine A3 Receptor AntagonistsAminoquinolinesGuanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate)ImidazolesN-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-cyclohexyl-1H-imidazo(4,5-c)quinolin-4-amineReceptor, Adenosine A3

Identifiers

PMID19077268
PMCPMC2625337
OpenAlexW2099948396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.