Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19077207›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2008

Interdependency of CEACAM-1, -3, -6, and -8 induced human neutrophil adhesion to endothelial cells.

Keith M Skubitz, Amy P N Skubitz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CEACAM1 in vascular homeostasis and inflammation.European journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  8. The role of CEACAMs in neutrophil function.European journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. CEACAM expression in anFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  13. Old and New Blood Markers in Human Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keith M SkubitzThe Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. skubi001@tc.umn.edu
Amy P N Skubitz
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

OVARIAN CARCINOMA--ROLE OF LAMININ AND ITS RECEPTORSR01CA060658 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SKUBITZ, AMY PATRICE · 1993 to 1996
–
NCI NIH HHS CA60658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the carcinoembryonic antigen family (CEACAMs) are widely expressed, and, depending on the tissue, capable of regulating diverse functions including tumor promotion, tumor suppression, angiogenesis, and neutrophil activation. Four members of this family, CEACAM1, CEACAM8, CEACAM6, and CEACAM3 (recognized by CD66a, CD66b, CD66c, and CD66d mAbs, respectively), are expressed on human neutrophils. CD66a, CD66b, CD66c, and CD66d antibodies each increase neutrophil adhesion to human umbilical vein endothelial cell monolayers. This increase in neutrophil adhesion caused by CD66 antibodies is blocked by CD18 mAbs and is associated with upregulation of CD11/CD18 on the neutrophil surface. To examine potential interactions of CEACAMs in neutrophil signaling, the effects on neutrophil adhesion to human umbilical vein endothelial cells of a set of CD66 mAbs was tested following desensitization to stimulation by various combinations of these mAbs. Addition of a CD66 mAb in the absence of calcium results in desensitization of neutrophils to stimulation by that CD66 mAb. The current data show that desensitization of neutrophils to any two CEACAMs results in selective desensitization to those two CEACAMs, while the cells remain responsive to the other two neutrophil CEACAMs. In addition, cells desensitized to CEACAM-3, -6, and -8 were still responsive to stimulation of CEACAM1 by CD66a mAbs. In contrast, desensitization of cells to CEACAM1 and any two of the other CEACAMs left the cells unresponsive to all CD66 mAbs. Cells desensitized to any combination of CEACAMs remained responsive to the unrelated control protein CD63. Thus, while there is significant independence of the four neutrophil CEACAMs in signaling, CEACAM1 appears to play a unique role among the neutrophil CEACAMs. A model in which CEACAMs dimerize to form signaling complexes could accommodate the observations. Similar interactions may occur in other cells expressing CEACAMs.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CDCarcinoembryonic AntigenCell AdhesionCell Adhesion MoleculesCell LineEndothelial CellsGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansNeutrophilsSignal TransductionAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CDCarcinoembryonic AntigenCD66 antigensCEACAM3 protein, humanCEACAM6 protein, humanCEACAM8 protein, humanCell Adhesion MoleculesGPI-Linked Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19077207
PMCPMC2628881
OpenAlexW2140849110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.