Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19077187›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2008

Genome wide survey, discovery and evolution of repetitive elements in three Entamoeba species.

Hernan Lorenzi, Mathangi Thiagarajan, Brian Haas, Jennifer Wortman, Neil Hall, Elisabet Caler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of GC content on de novo gene birth.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Episomal and chromosomal DNA replication and recombination inFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. TheCurrent tropical medicine reports · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Evolutionary genomics and population structure of Entamoeba histolytica.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hernan LorenziJ, Craig Venter Institute, 9704 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. hlorenzi@jcvi.org
Mathangi Thiagarajan
Brian Haas
Jennifer Wortman
Neil Hall
Elisabet Caler
J. Craig Venter Institute · USBroad Institute · USUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification and mapping of repetitive elements is a key step for accurate gene prediction and overall structural annotation of genomes. During the assembly and annotation of three highly repetitive amoeba genomes, Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba invadens, we performed comparative sequence analysis to identify and map all class I and class II transposable elements in their sequences.

resultsHere, we report the identification of two novel Entamoeba-specific repeats: ERE1 and ERE2; ERE1 is spread across the three genomes and associated with different repeats in a species-specific manner, while ERE2 is unique to E. histolytica. We also report the identification of two novel subfamilies of LINE and SINE retrotransposons in E. dispar and provide evidence for how the different LINE and SINE subfamilies evolved in these species. Additionally, we found a putative transposase-coding gene in E. histolytica and E. dispar related to the mariner transposon Hydargos from E. invadens. The distribution of transposable elements in these genomes is markedly skewed with a tendency of forming clusters. More than 70% of the three genomes have a repeat density below their corresponding average value indicating that transposable elements are not evenly distributed. We show that repeats and repeat-clusters are found at syntenic break points between E. histolytica and E. dispar and hence, could work as recombination hot spots promoting genome rearrangements.

conclusionThe mapping of all transposable elements found in these parasites shows that repeat coverage is up to three times higher than previously reported. LINE, ERE1 and mariner elements were present in the common ancestor to the three Entamoeba species while ERE2 was likely acquired by E. histolytica after its separation from E. dispar. We demonstrate that E. histolytica and E. dispar share their entire repertoire of LINE and SINE retrotransposons and that Eh_SINE3/Ed_SINE1 originated as a chimeric SINE from Eh/Ed_SINE2 and Eh_SINE1/Ed_SINE3. Our work shows that transposable elements are organized in clusters, frequently found at syntenic break points providing insights into their contribution to chromosome instability and therefore, to genomic variation and speciation in these parasites.

Indexed as

Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsBiological EvolutionDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ProtozoanEntamoebaEntamoeba histolyticaLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsRetroelementsSequence Analysis, DNAShort Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsTransposasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Protozoanmariner transposasesRetroelementsTransposases

Identifiers

PMID19077187
PMCPMC2657916
OpenAlexW2039944105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.