Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19076666›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2008

Patient evaluations of accessibility and co-ordination in general practice in Europe.

Michel Wensing, Jan Hermsen, Richard Grol, Joachim Szecsenyi

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. The importance of physician-patient relationship for improvement of adherence to long-term therapy: data of survey in a cohort of multiple sclerosis patients with mild and moderate disability.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2012
    Article
  10. Confidence in receiving medical care when seriously ill: a seven-country comparison of the impact of cost barriers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michel WensingCentre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. m.wensing@kwazo.umcn.nl
Jan Hermsen
Richard Grol
Joachim Szecsenyi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether patient evaluations of the accessibility to general practice and co-ordination with other care providers were associated with characteristics of general practice organizations.

backgroundIn 1998 patients across Europe perceived that small general practices have better accessibility than large practices. Since then a number of changes in primary care have had impact on accessibility and co-ordination of care. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsThe study was based on data from the European Practice Assessment study, an observational study in 284 general practices in 10 countries in 2004.

main outcome measuresPatient evaluations of general practice were measured with the 23-item Europep instrument, from which seven items on accessibility and co-ordination were selected in a principal factor analysis. Six practice characteristics were examined: percentage of female general practitioners, mean age of physicians, mean number of physician hours worked per week, number of general practitioners, number of care providers, urbanization level. Mixed regression models were applied, in which patients were clustered within practices, and practices within countries.

resultsPractices with a higher numbers of care providers received less positive patient evaluations (b= -0.112, P=0.004). The other practice characteristics were not related to patient evaluations. Only a small proportion of the total variation in patient evaluations of accessibility and co-ordination (1.8%) was explained by characteristics of the general practice organizations.

conclusionsGeneral practices have become larger in most developed countries in recent years, but patients seemed to prefer general practice organizations with fewer health professionals.

Indexed as

AdultAppointments and SchedulesContinuity of Patient CareCross-Cultural ComparisonCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFamily PracticeFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services ResearchHumansMalePatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Management, MedicalPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID19076666
PMCPMC5060457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.