Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19076664›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2008

Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: does it occur and does it make a difference?

Larissa Nekhlyudov, Rong Li, Suzanne W Fletcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Guideline
  3. What is the point: will screening mammography save my life?BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2009
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Breast Density Awareness and Knowledge, and Intentions for Breast Cancer Screening in a Diverse Sample of Women Age Eligible for Mammography.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Larissa NekhlyudovDepartment of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA 02215, USA. larissa_nekhlyudov@harvardpilgrim.org
Rong Li
Suzanne W Fletcher

Funding

Harvard Education Program in Cancer Prevention Control (R25T)R25CA057711 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI DAVISON, KIRSTEN · 1992 to 2018
$8.5M
The Harvard Chan Education Program in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA057711 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Karen M. Emmons, ANNE LINDSAY FRAZIER · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS 5-R25-CA57711-10NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057711NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInformed decision making regarding screening mammography is recommended for women under age 50. To what extent it occurs in clinical settings is unclear.

methodsUsing a mailed instrument, we surveyed women aged 40-44 prior to their first screening mammogram. All women were members of a large health maintenance organization and received care at a large medical practice in the Greater Boston area. The survey measured informed decision making, decisional conflict, satisfaction, and screening mammography knowledge and intentions to undergo screening.

resultsNinety-six women responded to the survey (response rate 47%). Overall, women reported limited informed decision making regarding screening mammography, both with respect to information exchange and involvement in the decision process. Less than half (47%) reported discussing the benefits of screening; 23% the uncertainties; and only 7% the harms. About 30% reported discussing the nature of the decision or clinical issue; and 29% reported their provider elicited their preferred role in the decision; 38% their preferences; and 24% their understanding of the information. Women who were uninformed had higher decisional conflict (2.37 vs. 1.83, P=0.005) about screening mammography and were more likely to be dissatisfied with the information and involvement. Women's screening mammography knowledge was limited in most areas; however being presented with information did not diminish their intentions to undergo screening.

conclusionInformed decision making before initiating screening mammography is limited in this setting. There appears to be little indication that information about the benefits and harms decreases women's intentions to undergo screening. Methods to communicate information to women before initiating screening mammography are needed.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeWomen's HealthAdultBostonBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGroup Practice, PrepaidHealth Care SurveysHealth Maintenance OrganizationsHumansIntentionMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID19076664
PMCPMC5060464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.