Trial reportJournal of epidemiology2008
Increasing the number of SNP loci does not necessarily improve prediction power at least in the comparison of MTHFR SNP and haplotypes.
Trial report in Journal of epidemiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Nutritional Supplements for Reducing Homocysteine Levels in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Nutrition reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Genetic polymorphisms in homocysteine metabolism and response to folate intake: a comprehensive strategy to elucidate useful genetic information.Journal of epidemiology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRapid advances in genotyping technology have made it possible to easily utilize a large number of genetic markers. According to information theory, an increase in the number of markers provides more information; however, the clinical usefulness does not increase linearly. This study aimed to assess the effect of folic acid supplementation quantitatively in MTHFR haplotypes, and compare its prediction power with that of the C677T single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) alone.
methodsThe study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, designed in accordance with the CONSORT statement. The participants were 202 healthy Japanese males who were administered either folic acid at 1 mg/day or a placebo postoperatively for 3 months. The primary endpoint was the total plasma homocysteine levels (tHcy). Stratified analysis by HapMap-based tag SNPs was performed.
resultsOf 52 SNPs on the MTHFR gene, 4 SNP loci covering more than 80% of the information were selected, and the haplotypes were estimated. The haplotypes were classified into 3 groups (Hap0, Hap1, and Hap2), on the basis of the number of times the most frequent haplotype was present. The greatest decrease was observed in Hap2 (6.61 micromol/L), compared with the other haplotypes (Hap0, 2.67; Hap1, 2.60) (trend test, P < 0.01). The haplotype information obtained was not more informative than that obtained with grouping by a single SNP, C677T, which strongly influences enzyme activity.
conclusionsGrouping by the C677T SNP alone was almost as good a predictor of the homocysteine-lowering effects as was grouping by the 4 best SNPs. This shows that increasing the number of typed SNPs does not necessarily provide more information, at least for this gene. A more efficient, cost-informative method for analyzing genomic data is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.