Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19075262›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2009

Phase II study of erlotinib plus temozolomide during and after radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme or gliosarcoma.

Michael D Prados, Susan M Chang, Nicholas Butowski, Rebecca DeBoer, Rupa Parvataneni, Hannah Carliner, Paul Kabuubi, Jennifer Ayers-Ringler, Jane Rabbitt, Margaretta Page and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00187486 (Phase II Study of Tarceva Plus Temodar During and Following Radiation Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme and Gliosarcoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 185 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
185citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00187486 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Study of Tarceva Plus Temodar During and Following Radiation Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme and Gliosarcoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2004 to 2011Enrolled66ConditionsGlioblastoma Multiforme, GliosarcomaArmsTarceva, Temodar, Radiation Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

185 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 376 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael D PradosUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. pradosm@neurosurg.ucsf.edu
Susan M Chang
Nicholas Butowski
Rebecca DeBoer
Rupa Parvataneni
Hannah Carliner
Paul Kabuubi
Jennifer Ayers-Ringler
Jane Rabbitt
Margaretta Page
Anne Fedoroff
Penny K Sneed
Mitchel S Berger
Michael W McDermott
Andrew T Parsa
Scott Vandenberg
C David James
Kathleen R Lamborn
David Stokoe
Daphne A Haas-Kogan
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tissue CoreP50CA097257 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Joseph F Costello · 2002 to 2026
$57.4M
NCI NIH HHS 2 P50 CA097257NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis open-label, prospective, single-arm, phase II study combined erlotinib with radiation therapy (XRT) and temozolomide to treat glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and gliosarcoma. The objectives were to determine efficacy of this treatment as measured by survival and to explore the relationship between molecular markers and treatment response. PATIENTS AND

methodsSixty-five eligible adults with newly diagnosed GBM or gliosarcoma were enrolled. We intended to treat patients not currently treated with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) with 100 mg/d of erlotinib during XRT and 150 mg/d after XRT. Patients receiving EIAEDs were to receive 200 mg/d of erlotinib during XRT and 300 mg/d after XRT. After XRT, the erlotinib dose was escalated until patients developed tolerable grade 2 rash or until the maximum allowed dose was reached. All patients received temozolomide during and after XRT. Molecular markers of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), EGFRvIII, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), and methylation status of the promotor region of the MGMT gene were analyzed from tumor tissue. Survival was compared with outcomes from two historical phase II trials.

resultsMedian survival was 19.3 months in the current study and 14.1 months in the combined historical control studies, with a hazard ratio for survival (treated/control) of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.91). Treatment was well tolerated. There was a strong positive correlation between MGMT promotor methylation and survival, as well as an association between MGMT promotor-methylated tumors and PTEN positivity shown by immunohistochemistry with improved survival.

conclusionPatients treated with the combination of erlotinib and temozolomide during and following radiotherapy had better survival than historical controls. Additional studies are warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDacarbazineErlotinib HydrochlorideGlioblastomaGliosarcomaHumansMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinesTemozolomideAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineErlotinib HydrochlorideProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinesTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID19075262
PMCPMC2645859
OpenAlexW2133198620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.