Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19073995›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2009

Macrophage responses to silica nanoparticles are highly conserved across particle sizes.

Katrina M Waters, Lisa M Masiello, Richard C Zangar, Barbara J Tarasevich, Norman J Karin, Ryan D Quesenberry, Somnath Bandyopadhyay, Justin G Teeguarden, Joel G Pounds, Brian D Thrall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. New "Omics" Approaches as Tools to Explore Mechanistic Nanotoxicology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Signaling Pathways Regulated by Silica Nanoparticles.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genotoxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles: Status and prospects.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Phosphonate coating of SiOParticle and fibre toxicology · 2018
    Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katrina M WatersEnvironmental Biomarkers Program, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, USA,
Lisa M Masiello
Richard C Zangar
Barbara J Tarasevich
Norman J Karin
Ryan D Quesenberry
Somnath Bandyopadhyay
Justin G Teeguarden
Joel G Pounds
Brian D Thrall

Funding

Sytems Analysis of Nanoparticle BiocompatibilityR01ES016212 · NIEHS · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI THRALL, BRIAN D. · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES016212NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns about the potential adverse health effects of engineered nanoparticles stems in part from the possibility that some materials display unique chemical and physical properties at nanoscales which could exacerbate their biological activity. However, studies that have assessed the effect of particle size across a comprehensive set of biological responses have not been reported. Using a macrophage cell model, we demonstrate that the ability of unopsonized amorphous silica particles to stimulate inflammatory protein secretion and induce macrophage cytotoxicity scales closely with the total administered particle surface area across a wide range of particle diameters (7-500 nm). Whole genome microarray analysis of the early gene expression changes induced by 10- and 500-nm particles showed that the magnitude of change for the majority of genes affected correlated more tightly with particle surface area than either particle mass or number. Gene expression changes that were particle size-specific were also identified. However, the overall biological processes represented by all gene expression changes were nearly identical, irrespective of particle diameter. Direct comparison of the cell processes represented in the 10- and 500-nm particle gene sets using gene set enrichment analysis revealed that among 1009 total biological processes, none were statistically enriched in one particle size group over the other. The key mechanisms involved in silica nanoparticle-mediated gene regulation and cytotoxicity have yet to be established. However, our results suggest that on an equivalent nominal surface area basis, common biological modes of action are expected for nano- and supranano-sized silica particles.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineDose-Response Relationship, DrugElectrochemistryEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGene Expression ProfilingLightMacrophagesMiceNanoparticlesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisParticle SizeReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerScattering, RadiationSilicon DioxideRNA, MessengerSilicon DioxideSuspensions

Identifiers

PMID19073995
PMCPMC2639757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.