Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19073938›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

The defect in T-cell regulation in NOD mice is an effect on the T-cell effectors.

Anna Morena D'Alise, Vincent Auyeung, Markus Feuerer, Junko Nishio, Jason Fontenot, Christophe Benoist, Diane Mathis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The type 1 diabetes susceptibility locusFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Enhanced CD4Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Trisomy 21 dysregulates T cell lineages toward an autoimmunity-prone state associated with interferon hyperactivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  17. Next-generation regulatory T cell therapy.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hyaluronan in immune dysregulation and autoimmune diseases.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2019
    Review

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Morena D'AliseSection on Immunology and Immunogenetics, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Vincent Auyeung
Markus Feuerer
Junko Nishio
Jason Fontenot
Christophe Benoist
Diane Mathis
Joslin Diabetes Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

SPECIAL ASSAY COREP30DK036836 · NIDDK · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI JEAN E. SCHAFFER · 1986 to 2026
$50.5M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM007753 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WALENSKY, LOREN DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$50.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK036836NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK36836NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) protect against autoimmunity, type 1 diabetes (T1D) in particular, prompting the hypothesis that a deficiency in Tregs is a critical determinant of diabetes susceptibility in NOD mice. However, tests of this hypothesis have yielded contradictory results. We confirmed that NOD mice, compared with reference strains, do not have a primary deficit in Treg numbers in the lymphoid organs, whether in prediabetic mice of any age or in animals with recent-onset diabetes. NOD Tregs did show a defect in standard in vitro T cell suppression assays, particularly at low suppressor/effector ratios. Gene expression profiling revealed the vast majority of transcripts constituting the "Treg signature" to be normally distributed in NOD Tregs versus CD4(+) T conventional (Tconv) cells, although there were a few differences affecting one or the other population. According to results from criss-cross experiments, the functional inefficacy was not rooted in NOD Tregs, which suppressed as well as their C57BL/6 (B6) counterparts, but rather in NOD Tconv, which were less prone to suppression than were B6 Tconv cells. They also responded more effectively to anti-CD3/28 monoclonal antibody (mAb) stimulation in vitro or to a natural pancreatic antigen in vivo. This difference was independent of autoimmune inflammation, did not map to the idd3 region, and was not due to the overproduction of interleukin-21 in NOD mice. That the immune dysregulation in this T1D model is rooted in the ability of effector T cells to be regulated, rather than in Tregs themselves, has implications for proposed therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMice, Inbred NODAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAutoimmunityCD3 ComplexCD4 Lymphocyte CountDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Forkhead Transcription FactorsGene Expression ProfilingMiceT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryTumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 7Antibodies, MonoclonalCD3 ComplexForkhead Transcription FactorsFoxp3 protein, mouseTumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 7

Identifiers

PMID19073938
PMCPMC2604930
OpenAlexW2162937688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.