Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19073865›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2009

Sequence-based identification of Aspergillus, fusarium, and mucorales species in the clinical mycology laboratory: where are we and where should we go from here?

S A Balajee, A M Borman, M E Brandt, J Cano, M Cuenca-Estrella, E Dannaoui, J Guarro, G Haase, C C Kibbler, W Meyer and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Challenges in ITS-based identification ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Prevalence ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Isolation and identification of the endophytic fungus J2-3 and its disease-preventive and growth-promoting effects on cucumber.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Identification and Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular Characterization and Antifungal Susceptibility ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

S A BalajeeMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. fir3@cdc.gov
A M Borman
M E Brandt
J Cano
M Cuenca-Estrella
E Dannaoui
J Guarro
G Haase
C C Kibbler
W Meyer
K O'Donnell
C A Petti
J L Rodriguez-Tudela
D Sutton
A Velegraki
B L Wickes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AspergillusClinical Laboratory TechniquesDNA, FungalFusariumHumansMucoralesMycosesPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID19073865
PMCPMC2668331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.