Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19073377›Full record

ArticleThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2008

Health-related quality of life in Taiwanese dialysis patients: effects of dialysis modality.

Lih-Wen Mau, Herng-Chia Chiu, Pi-Yu Chang, Su-Chen Hwang, Shang-Jyh Hwang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Impact of Hospitalization on the Quality of Life of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in Saudi Arabia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Health-related quality of life of Asian patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Singapore.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparison of self-reported health-related quality of life between Taiwan hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: a multi-center collaborative study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2011
    Article
  13. Measuring the health status burden in hemodialysis patients using the SF-36® health survey.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2011
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lih-Wen MauChronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Herng-Chia Chiu
Pi-Yu Chang
Su-Chen Hwang
Shang-Jyh Hwang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taiwan has the highest incidence and prevalence of end-stage renal disease worldwide. However, not many studies have focused on the influence of dialysis modality on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for dialysis patients in Taiwan. This study intended to compare the differences in HRQoL between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) and to evaluate the effects of dialysis modality on patient HRQoL. A cross-sectional survey using the Taiwan-version 36-item short-form health survey questionnaire (SF-36) was completed by 244 dialysis patients (58 PD and 186 HD patients) at two hospital-based dialysis units in southern Taiwan. Patient characteristics, diagnoses and laboratory data were individually extracted from the annual survey and matched with primary HRQoL data. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of dialysis modality on HRQoL. Compared with HD patients, PD patients had higher scores in six of the eight SF-36 subscales, including physical functioning, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, vitality, and mental health. However, only role limitations due to emotional problems and bodily pain reached significant difference levels (p < 0.05). After controlling for patient characteristics, comorbid conditions and laboratory values, the bodily pain score was 7.88 points higher for PD patients compared with HD patients, while the social functioning score was 9.00 points higher for HD patients compared with PD patients (p < 0.05). The present study provides cross-sectional confirmation for equivalent levels of HRQoL between PD and HD patients except for the subscales of bodily pain and social functioning. In addition to dialysis modality, HRQoL for dialysis patients may be more related to personal attributes, interactions with multiple diseases, social support and quality of care received. When informing patients about modality choices for dialysis, trade-offs should be discussed and individual preferences for specific aspects of HRQoL should be considered.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal DialysisRenal Dialysis

Identifiers

PMID19073377
PMCPMC11917996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.