Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19073222›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2009

Modeling operant behavior in the Parkinsonian rat.

Irene Avila, Mark P Reilly, Federico Sanabria, Diana Posadas-Sánchez, Claudia L Chavez, Nikhil Banerjee, Peter Killeen, Eddie Castañeda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reinforcement omission effects in rats with bilateral lesions in the substantia nigra pars compacta and ventral tegmental area.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Model-based and model-free mechanisms of human motor learning.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Irene AvilaDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, United States.
Mark P Reilly
Federico Sanabria
Diana Posadas-Sánchez
Claudia L Chavez
Nikhil Banerjee
Peter Killeen
Eddie Castañeda

Funding

MINORITY RESEARCH TRAINING IN NEUROSCIENCET32MH018882 · NIMH · AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION · PI MARTINEZ, JOSEPH L. · 1987 to 2009
$8.7M
MINORITY ACCESS TO RESEARCH CAREERST34GM008491 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI FEWELL, JENNIFER H · 1993 to 2008
$3.6M
Dynamic Models of ReconditioningR01MH066860 · NIMH · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KILLEEN, PETER R · 2003 to 2006
$637k
Cue-reactivity and attention in smokers and nonsmokersZ01DA000485 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI HEISHMAN, STEPHEN J. · 2005 to 2008
$464k
Toward a General Theory of Drug Behavior DynamicsK01DA000485 · NIDA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI REILLY, MARK P · 2001 to 2003
$224k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteIntramural NIH HHS Z01 DA000485NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA000485NIDA NIH HHS KO1 DA00485NIGMS NIH HHS 5 T34 GM08491-10NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM008491NIMH NIH HHS 5 T32 MH18882NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066860NIMH NIH HHS R01MH066860NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical principles of reinforcement (MPR; Killeen, 1994) is a quantitative model of operant behavior that contains three parameters representing motor capacity (delta), motivation (a), and short term memory (lambda). The present study applied MPR to characterize the effects of bilateral infusions of 6-OHDA into the substantia nigra pars compacta in the rat, a model of Parkinson's disease. Rats were trained to lever press under a 5-component fixed-ratio (5, 15, 30, 60, and 100) schedule of food reinforcement. Rats were tested for 15 days prior to dopamine lesions and again for 15 days post-lesion. To characterize functional loss relative to lesion size, rats were grouped according to the extent and the degree of lateralization of their dopamine loss. Response rates decreased as a function of dopamine depletion, primarily at intermediate ratios. MPR accounted for 98% of variance in pre- and post-lesion response rates. Consistent with reported disruptions in motor behavior induced by dopaminergic lesions, estimates of delta increased when dopamine was severely depleted. There was no support for different estimates of a based on pre- and post-lesion performance of any lesion group, suggesting that dopamine loss has negligible effects on incentive motivation. The present study demonstrates the usefulness of combining operant techniques with a theoretical model to better understand the effects of a neurochemical manipulation.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantDisease Models, AnimalMemory, Short-TermMotivationMotor ActivityAnimalsDopamineFoodMaleMicroinjectionsOxidopamineParkinson DiseaseRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReinforcement, PsychologyReinforcement ScheduleDopamineOxidopamineSympatholytics

Identifiers

PMID19073222
PMCPMC2664313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.