Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1907287›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1991

Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton after microinjection of proteolytic fragments of alpha-actinin.

F M Pavalko, K Burridge

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Contributions of Titin and Collagen to Passive Stress in Muscles fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Neuronal migration is mediated by inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1 via α-actinin and focal adhesion kinase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Integrin-dependent force transmission to the extracellular matrix by α-actinin triggers adhesion maturation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Investigating complexity of protein-protein interactions in focal adhesions.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2008
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F M PavalkoDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599.
K Burridge
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

STRUCTURE/FUNCTION OF FOCAL ADHESIONSR01GM029860 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BURRIDGE, KEITH · 1985 to 2018
$6.7M
EFFECTS OF TUMOR PROMOTERS ON FOCAL CONTACT PROTEINSF32CA008493 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PAVALKO, FREDRICK M · 1988 to 1990
–
NCI NIH HHS CA-08493NIGMS NIH HHS GM29860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alpha-actinin can be proteolytically cleaved into major fragments of 27 and 53 kD using the enzyme thermolysin. The 27-kD fragment contains an actin-binding site and we have recently shown that the 53-kD fragment binds to the cytoplasmic domain of beta 1 integrin in vitro (Otey, C. A., F. M. Pavalko, and K. Burridge. 1990. J. Cell Biol. 111:721-729). We have explored the behavior of the isolated 27- and 53-kD fragments of alpha-actinin after their microinjection into living cells. Consistent with its containing a binding site for actin, the 27-kD fragment was detected along stress fibers within 10-20 min after injection into rat embryo fibroblasts (REF-52). The 53-kD fragment of alpha-actinin, however, concentrated in focal adhesions of REF-52 cells 10-20 min after injection. The association of this fragment with focal adhesions in vivo is consistent with its interaction in vitro with the cytoplasmic domain of the beta 1 subunit of integrin, which was also localized at these sites. When cells were injected with greater than 5 microM final concentration of either alpha-actinin fragment and cultured for 30-60 min, most stress fibers were disassembled. At this time, however, many of the focal adhesions, particularly those around the cell periphery, remained after most stress fibers had gone. By 2 h after injection only a few small focal adhesions persisted, yet the cells remained spread. Identical results were obtained with other cell types including primary chick fibroblasts, BSC-1, MDCK, and gerbil fibroma cells. Stress fibers and focal adhesions reformed if cells were allowed to recover for 18 h after injection. These data suggest that introduction of the monomeric 27-kD fragment of alpha-actinin into cells may disrupt the actin cytoskeleton by interfering with the function of endogenous, intact alpha-actinin molecules along stress fibers. The 53-kD fragment may interfere with endogenous alpha-actinin function at focal adhesions or by displacing some other component that binds to the rod domain of alpha-actinin and that is needed to maintain stress fiber organization.

Indexed as

ActininActinsAnimalsCell LineChick EmbryoCytoskeletal ProteinsCytoskeletonElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelImmunohistochemistryMicroinjectionsMicroscopy, FluorescencePeptide FragmentsProtein BindingRatsVinculinActininActinsCytoskeletal ProteinsPeptide FragmentsVinculin

Identifiers

PMID1907287
PMCPMC2289090
OpenAlexW2067083395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.