Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19071960›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2008

A signaling protease required for melanization in Drosophila affects resistance and tolerance of infections.

Janelle S Ayres, David S Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A secreted fatty acid- and retinol- binding protein frombioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Parasitic nematode secreted phospholipase AFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Silencing of the Prophenoloxidase GeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Janelle S AyresDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
David S Schneider

Funding

MOLECULAR BASIS OF HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONT32AI007328 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JUSTIN L SONNENBURG · 1987 to 2026
$11.9M
Adaptation in the Drosophila innate immune responseR01AI069164 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHNEIDER, DAVID S. · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069164NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007328PHS HHS R01 A1053080-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organisms evolve two routes to surviving infections-they can resist pathogen growth (resistance) and they can endure the pathogenesis of infection (tolerance). The sum of these two properties together defines the defensive capabilities of the host. Typically, studies of animal defenses focus on either understanding resistance or, to a lesser extent, tolerance mechanisms, thus providing little understanding of the relationship between these two mechanisms. We suggest there are nine possible pairwise permutations of these traits, assuming they can increase, decrease, or remain unchanged in an independent manner. Here we show that by making a single mutation in the gene encoding a protease, CG3066, active in the melanization cascade in Drosophila melanogaster, we observe the full spectrum of changes; these mutant flies show increases and decreases in their resistance and tolerance properties when challenged with a variety of pathogens. This result implicates melanization in fighting microbial infections and shows that an immune response can affect both resistance and tolerance to infections in microbe-dependent ways. The fly is often described as having an unsophisticated and stereotypical immune response where single mutations cause simple binary changes in immunity. We report a level of complexity in the fly's immune response that has strong ecological implications. We suggest that immune responses are highly tuned by evolution, since selection for defenses that alter resistance against one pathogen may change both resistance and tolerance to other pathogens.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial InfectionsBurkholderia cepaciaBurkholderia InfectionsCarboxypeptidasesDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEnterococcus faecalisEnzyme ActivationEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleGenes, InsectGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsImmune ToleranceListeriosisMaleCarboxypeptidasesDrosophila ProteinsMelaninsMonophenol MonooxygenaseSerine EndopeptidasesSp7 protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID19071960
PMCPMC2596860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.